State Asks Marlboro Ethics Board to Look Closer at Marder Decision

Department of Community Affairs wants board to further examine councilwoman's relationship with two companies that did business with Marlboro.

The Local Finance Board of the Department of Community Affairs has asked the Marlboro Ethics Board to reconsider its original ethics decision, stating Councilwoman Randi Marder's husband conducting business with the township is a perceived impropriety.

In a letter to the Marlboro Ethics Board on Jan. 29, the department stated, "Any appearance of impropriety or tacit influence on others by an elected official impugns the standards set forth in the Local Government Ethics law."

The Local Finance Board is now asking the Marlboro Ethics Board to more closely examine Marder's relationship to two businesses that had transactions with the municipality. The board is requesting the Marlboro Ethics Board apply the standards of state ethics law.

"This is just asking them to take a look at the case in another way, I don't believe Councilwoman Marder did anything wrong," Mayor Jon Hornik said.

Patch was not able to reach Marder in time for publication. Marder's comments will be added in an updated version of this story.

In June, the Marlboro Ethics Board dismissed a claim from former council candidate Chris Dean, citing a lack of evidence. The claim originated in October of 2011, days before Marder and Dean went head to head in a Marlboro council race.

Dean alleged that Marlboro Township's use of a Manalapan printing company is unethical because the firm, . Dean supplied township records, including invoices from the company, as evidence.

According to the Department of Community Affairs, the township conducted $42,000 of business with companies owned by or affiliated with Marder.

Hornik said Inkwell has been working with the township for many years, offering products at cost.

Marder told Patch last year that the business has printed Shop Marlboro signs for the township as well as other marketing materials for about 30 years.

After review since June, the Local Finance Board of the Department of Community Affairs has asked the Marlboro Ethics Board to reconsider two matters using the “appropriate legal standard."

Throughout the seven-month process within Marlboro Township, Dean questioned the ability of the Ethics Board to make a decision, asking it the complaint could be moved to a state level where perceived conflicts of interested would be avoided.

"Some of you even go out to eat with the mayor," Dean said to the board at a March meeting.

The complaint was filed with the municipal ethics board, therefore could not be moved to the state without first being considered locally. Dean appealed the municipal board's decision in August.

According to the state Finance Board, Marder's financial disclosure statements from 2008-2012 show Inkwell is a revenue source for her husband, but do not show her own ownership in the company.

In ethics testimony during the investigation in Marlboro, Marder said Inkwell is owned by her husband and his family.

“This quote would be inconsistent with the information provided in her FDS from 2008 to 2012 because, as noted above, she does not disclose any ownership interests of Inkwell for herself or her husband," the Local Finance Board said.

Hornik said the township has never had a contract with Inkwell Global, and the amount of services do not require a contract. 

By law, a business is subject to a Township Council vote and public bid process if the business receives more than $17,500 from the township in one year. Invoices submitted by Dean showed the largest transaction was around $360. 

Dean did not submit every invoice between Inkwell and Marlboro Township to the board.

"This is strictly a politically motivated charge brought by Chris Dean, and he continues to waste taxpayer money to make a name for himself," Hornik said. 

During the investigation by the Marlboro Ethics Board, the board exceeded its approved legal costs and submitted a request for more money from the township. The Township Council has since asked the board to justify those costs. Marder recused herself from those discussions.

The ethics charges against Marder are now remanded back to the Marlboro Ethics Board for further investigation into Marder's relationship with the businesses.

Assemblywoman Amy Handlin (R-13) said, “I find it surprising and more than a little disappointing that a local elected official would allow the town she represents to spend taxpayer dollars with her family business without disclosing her interests in the business." 

In August, Patch discovered the township no longer uses Inkwell Global for Recreation trophies.

Frank LaRocca February 08, 2013 at 02:09 AM
Please let Mr. Dean know that ethics complaints by law are private unless and until they become public under the law. I will prosecute any and every person or entity that violates this law to the fullest extent. If I did something wrong, it should be public. But politically motivated drivel file by a loser (quite handily) of a campaign against me that are bogus and defamatory will be met with swift and aggressive legal action.
Tugwalla February 08, 2013 at 01:36 PM
This is the norm in any Democrat administration...look at whats happening in surrounding towns run by Democrats...this is small potatoes compared to other stories on the patch!
tom thornton February 09, 2013 at 03:24 PM
It looks like you forgot the name Matthew V. Scannapieco??? A BIG TIME THIEF! He was the REPUBLICAN mayor of Marlboro who along with some membersrs and the chaidrman of Planning Board literally sold our town to developers.
Michael Mirkin February 11, 2013 at 02:23 PM
Like I said above it does not matter DEM or REP a thief is a thief. Political affiliation does not define one's character or integrity. "All Greatness of character is dependent on individuality. The man who has no other existence than that which he partakes in common with all around him, will never have any other than an existence of mediocrity". - James F. Cooper.
Michael Mirkin February 11, 2013 at 02:28 PM
Just in case anyone is interested in the law that is being referenced..... 5:35-1.2 Confidentiality (a) Any complaints statements information or documents obtained or prepared by the Board staff or the Board are deemed confidential and not subject to public disclosure during the course of the preliminary investigation or investigation to determine whether a violation of the Local Government Ethics law has occurred, except as necessary for the Board's staff or the Board to conduct the preliminary investigation or investigation. (b) The Board's discussion regarding a preliminary investigation or investigation shall be in executive session. However. any vote by the Board regarding a preliminary investigation or investigation shall be in public session. in public session. the complaint shall only be identified by a docket number. detennined by the Board 's staff. (c) The Notice the complaint and allied statements or infornation obtained by the Board's staff during the course of the preliminary investigation or investigation are subject to public disclosure 30 days after mailing a Notice of Dismissal, pursuant to NJ.A.C. 5:35-I.1(h), or a Notice of Violation, pursuant to N.JAC. 5:35-I.1(i).


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »