.

Sandy and Recession to Deliver Double-Whammy to Tax Base

Ocean City's ratable base continues to decrease.

The combined value of all real estate in Ocean City continues to shrink, and that could lead to higher taxes for some property owners.

Damage assessments in the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and an ongoing project by the city to reassess properties based on lower market values could combine to wipe out about $900 million in Ocean City property value this year.

Ocean City's ratable base is anticipated to be about $11.3 billion this year, down from $12.2 billion last year, according to Ocean City Finance Director Frank Donato.

"The lion's share of that decrease will be from the compliance plan (the city's reassessment project), but appeals and storm damage assessments (which are still underway) are pieces of that decrease as well," Donato said.

Donato does not have final figures yet, and municipalities were granted extra time this year to finalize their books. He said the city administration will have a final figure by the time it presents a budget to City Council on Feb. 14.

With more than 19,000 taxable properties, many of them valuable waterfront homes, Ocean City enjoys one of the highest ratable bases of all municipalities in New Jersey (seventh in 2010). The high value of Ocean City's properties allows the city to keep tax rates low. But as the ratable base falls, tax rates increase.

Even if the city were to collect the same overall amount of money from taxpayers this year (a flat tax levy), taxpayers would be affected unevenly. The owners whose properties were not damaged would pay more in taxes to compensate for owners whose properties were damaged (and assessed at lower values).

It's a situation that existed in 2011 when the ratable base fell by more than $681 million in Ocean City through tax appeals and the compliance plan. Even though Ocean City's overall tax levy decreased (because the city delivered a lean budget), the tax rate increased by 4.91 percent. 

Owners whose properties were reassessed (on average) paid less in taxes (as the decrease in their property value more than offset the rate increase). But owners whose properties were not reassessed paid more.

A similar situation will likely exist this year. But with the city administration still drafting a budget that will have to take into account expenses related to the recovery from Superstorm Sandy, the city administration will be hard-pressed to deliver another budget with flat increases.

But even as difficult as the estimated 7.4 percent decrease in Ocean City's ratable base may be, other towns have it worse.

"More than a dozen municipalities in the state could lose at least 10 percent of their tax bases," according to a report in the New York Times by Alison Leigh Cowan.

Toms River reported that property tax receipts could drop by as much as 15 percent, according to the New York Times story.

Tuckerton in Ocean County lost almost 20 percent of its property tax base, and in Sea Bright, only half the homes are inhabitable.

"Without new revenues, state and local officials and Wall Street analysts said, these areas may have to make deep cuts in spending on schools, police and fire departments and other services," Cowan writes. "They also may be hard-pressed to finance rebuilding."

Read "Towns' Next Hit From Hurricane Is to Tax Revenue" in the New York Times.

Sunny Demeanor January 31, 2013 at 01:20 PM
The hits just keep on coming...
Eric Sauder January 31, 2013 at 11:08 PM
It would be great if in response to a diminishing tax base the City would do what it can to reduce spending instead of simply increasing the tax rate. I'm not sure how much more the tax payers can bear.
John K January 31, 2013 at 11:41 PM
Well stated Eric. Unfortunately I'm sure that the city administration does not care what the taxpayers want. They are big spenders.
Karen Bolden February 01, 2013 at 12:38 AM
Eric.......you are EXACTLY right. Why not discuss cuts and ways to decrease spending. The immediate thought is to raise taxes on people who are at their complete limit with what they can endure.......WE need to vote them out.....the power is ours!!
Tom Kline February 02, 2013 at 01:14 AM
Close the fancy beach front high school and the equally extravagant library. Come on wake up and blame those that having been spending like drunken fools in OC!
oclocal1 February 02, 2013 at 12:15 PM
Time to get our voices heard! Certain council members have have served on council way to long and feel they own this city. The next time we vote lets get out with the old and vote in new! We should limit the time any one member can serve on council or else things will never change!
Karen Bolden February 02, 2013 at 12:58 PM
oclocal.........from your lips.... the last election most of the same people were re-elected in spite of their big spending and non-concern for the people they represent so I doubt things will change. For some reason, people just get complacent and leave them in, as you said, way too long and the new ones, like Pete G, who ran on fiscal responsibility, turn out to be bullied by the rest. THEY ALL NEED TO GO, ALL OF THEM
John K February 02, 2013 at 01:38 PM
When running for office Tony Wilson said that he would not be a big spender. Now that he is a councilman he votes yes for every wasteful spending bill. Voters should elect new candidates every election.
Eric Sauder February 03, 2013 at 08:01 PM
Karen swapping Manny for Mo won’t result in change. What it takes to win an election is organization and money. There are commercial interests here that have both, and they’ve been successful at getting their candidates elected. Once in office those candidates represent the interests of the people who put them there. Finally exposed they get voted out of office and someone new takes their place. People come and people go but the machine rolls on forever. What we need is some kind of grass roots political organization to promote and support independent candidates. The power resides with the people but they have to exercise it. To be effective the electorate needs to be informed and involved. Independent candidates need a level playing field. Nothing will change here until we succeed at electing people whose first loyalty lies with the people, and with their interests. I’ve been following politics in this town for a couple of years now, and I’ve never seen anything quite like it. I’m sure the same exists in other municipalities and at the state and national level too, but I’ve never been exposed to it before. I think I understand exactly how this town works. It’s quite complex and I only scratched the surface here.
Eric Sauder February 03, 2013 at 08:07 PM
Roy Wagner is a man of impeccable integrity. I don’t think Pete was supposed to be elected. We’ve bucked the trend in the 4th ward and have been a bastion of independence. I’m proud to count myself with the people of the 4th ward.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something