.
Feedback

Reports Show Small War Chests in Battle for BYOB and Council Seats

The state released campaign finance reports on Monday for the May 8 municipal election.

Campaign finance reports filed by City Council candidates and two political committees on opposite sides of the BYOB question show mostly small contributions and expenses.

The New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission (ELEC) released on Monday reports that were required to be filed 29 days before the May 8 municipal election. The ELEC reports are designed to make elections more transparent by disclosing to the public campaign contributors and campaign expenses.

The richest campaign is that of the Committee to Preserve Ocean City — the political committee opposing the "Bring Your Own Bottle" (BYOB) initiative. The committee's 29-day pre-election report shows $11,556 in contributions but shows no detail on contributors (it was unclear on Monday if the omission was ELEC's or the committee's). The ELEC website shows no report filed by the Friends of Shop, Dine and Play in Ocean City — the political committee supporting BYOB.

Several candidates declared that they intended to spend less than $4,000 on the campaign, which limits the reporting requirements. The hottest race may be in the Fourth Ward, where three candidates are vying for one seat.

The May 8 election in Ocean City will decide four seats on City Council and a binding ballot question on allowing BYOB restaurants in the dry town. Some ELEC reports are shown in the attached PDFs.

 

BYOB POLITICAL COMMITTEES:

Committee to Preserve Ocean City: The political committee opposing the BYOB initiative filed a 29-day pre-election report that declares $11,556 in contributions — including $9,418 in donation(s) greater than $300 and $2,138 in donations of $300 or less. The committee has spent $4,861.80.

None of the other pages or schedules showing the detail of contributions and expenses is posted.

Friends of Shop, Dine and Play in Ocean City: The political committee supporting the BYOB initiative has registered with the New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, but no pre-election campaign finance report has been posted on the ELEC website.

 

FIRST WARD:

Michael DeVlieger: Reported $1,575 in contributions ($1,175 from himself and $400 in donations of $300 or less). DeVlieger spent $1,175 (including $400 for advertising on Ocean City Patch).

Fred Hoffman: Completed Form A-1 stating that he does not plan to spend more than $4,000 on the campaign or accept any contribution greater than $300 (without reporting it). Hoffman later reported a $100 contribution from a First Ward retiree.

 

SECOND WARD:

Antwan McClellan: No reports for McClellan are posted.

John W. Quinn: Completed Form A-1 stating that he does not plan to spend more than $4,000 on the campaign or accept any contribution greater than $300 (without reporting it).

Quinn also filed a 29-day pre-election report declaring $425 in monetary contributions of $300 or less and $100 in expenditures.

 

THIRD WARD:

Steven Fenichel: Completed Form A-1 stating that he does not plan to spend more than $4,000 on the campaign or accept any contribution greater than $300 (without reporting it).

Anthony P. Wilson: Completed Form A-1 stating that he does not plan to spend more than $4,000 on the campaign or accept any contribution greater than $300 (without reporting it).

 

FOURTH WARD:

Pete Guinosso: Reported $4,063 in contributions (including $2,000 from himself and $2,063 in small donations) and $1,283.71 in expenses — the bulk of it for a mailing. Guinosso has a balance of $2,779.29.

Ed Price: Reported $3,700 in contributions (including $2,000 from himself and $1,700 in small donations) and $2,355.42 in expenses — the bulk of it for a mailing and radio commercials on WIBG-AM. Price has a balance of $1,344.58.

Bart Russell: Completed Form A-1 stating that he does not plan to spend more than $4,000 on the campaign or accept any contribution greater than $300 (without reporting it). Russell later submitted a form reporting $1,347 in contributions, including $299 from Brian and Caren Broadley. Brian Broadley is owner of Broadley's MDI, a Marmora plumbing and HVAC company, and he is president of the Ocean City Regional Chamber of Commerce.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Ocean City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

janet April 17, 2012 at 01:46 pm
This Committee to Preserve Ocean City is the most comical thing I have heard in a long time. Where were these phonies when the developers and realtors took over Ocean City knocking down all the single homes and putting up one plastic condo after another? Where was this "preservation" committee when the Sunday laws were done away with? Ocean City will never be the same since the developers and realtors took over lining their pockets (and contributing money for hideous SIGNS?)
Oh this group is so transparent ---- but then some people will do anything to get the attention they crave and this no BYOB just filled the gap after the last fiasco.
Ellen April 17, 2012 at 04:06 pm
Where were YOU when "the developers and realtors took over OC knocking down all the single homes and putting up one plastic condo after another?" as you stated? Where were YOU when the Sunday Blue Laws were done away with? Are you a problem solver or just a complainer?
occonfused April 17, 2012 at 04:17 pm
What difference does it make Ellen where she was ? Are you implying since there was not a forum for Janet to post in the late 1990's and early 2000's, that she is not entitled to call out those who have selective memory when it comes to Preservation in Ocean City ? Or is it because with the increase of all these incredibly unattractive duplexes that the H and L's and dougherty and johnson's slammed all over the island, those "Preservationists" sold out and moved off the island. By the way, that was entirely their right. Ironically I am against BYOB, but not for the "Moral" reason these people give. As an economist, I do not see it helping the island as it is being predicted. I would much rather see a solid economic plan to revitalize the downtown shopping district year round, making this a true destination resort, not a three month slam the $4.50 slice a pizza and $20 parking tab down their throats !!!!
Eleanor April 17, 2012 at 04:41 pm
I think we all have memories of people who built something up, got it pushed through and then left town leaving the rest of us to carry the burden. Does anyone remember how that high school was handled? And where are all the families who were supposed to move here? Where are all those 18 year old 'locals' who voted for it and haven't been seen since?
I also do not see how BYOB - simply allowing some people to bring a bottle or a six pack in certain restaurants is going to help the overall downtown. I agree that a solid plan, based on a review (and not by one of those high priced market analysis companies that costs the taxpayer a few hundred grand) of the problems and the possible solutions is in order before we make one more attempt to patch together a temporary solution to the problem.
Richard Jacoby April 17, 2012 at 05:15 pm
Without the condo development, what would the price of entering the real estate market be in OC? Would we have a town made only for the wealthy and those who inherited their property? A modest condo costs a half million at minimum. It certainly raised propert taxes collected I think the town needed it so even well off families could afford market entry. People of varying incomes should be able to realize the dream of a house at the shore We can't have a entry price of 750,000 or more for a small shack, and expect people to make it their primary home.
Al Czervik April 17, 2012 at 05:37 pm
"People of varying incomes should be able to realize the dream of a house at the shore".
Why? Lollipops & rainbows for everyone
Surfsup April 17, 2012 at 09:14 pm
You might all be interested to know that these so called Preservationist's involved in the NoBYOB are the same Real Estate Agents that profited from the demolition of Ocean City. They made their money which means everything in OC is just fine!
Ellen April 18, 2012 at 01:11 am
OCConfused - My comment about where Janet was had nothing to do with her not having a place to post in the late 90's and early 2's. I was asking if she was involved in an effort to stop the condo overbuild, was she going door to door to gather the troops. Or is she simply pointing a finger at the POC group '"phonies" as she calls them... sigh - that has recently formed and chastising them for not being active way back when. Huh? And what good does name calling do? It's childish. BUT more importantly if someone doesn't have an original thought (janet) then don't copy someone else's post:
Jessie 5:41 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Oh - I love this phony baloney "Committee to Preserve Ocean City." Where were these preservationists when the developers and realtors knocked down all the single homes to build condos for summer residents and renters? This Committee sure is selective in its quest to preserve Ocean City. Ocean City is such a far cry from what it was and that is because it is no longer a year round community with single family homes - does this phony committee worry about that? Doesn't appear so. And weren't there laws about sales on Sundays? Did this committee work to preserve those laws? No this is a very select group with very select notions of preservation. What a bunch of phonies!!! Not even a thought of your own. Shame on you.
Ellen April 18, 2012 at 01:14 am
Re: BYOB. I too am against it and have been posting for months and months that it did not make financial sense for the restaurant owners nor would it revitalize downtown. The plan laid out by the Pro BYOB group, IMHO, was thrown together with not much thought or business sense. Even the group name doesn't pass the Marketing 101 test: 'Friends of Shop, Dine and Play" zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..... oh sorry I feel asleep.
Tired of Hypocrisy April 18, 2012 at 09:14 am
"People of varying incomes should be able to realize the dream of a house at the shore". By your analogy, because I would like to live in Newport, they should knock down all the lovely homes, build ugly condo's just so I can live there. Before the tear down & rebuilding of Ocean City began in the 90's, it was a much nicer town. For those looking to own a home at the 'shore', there were other shore towns those of very modest means could purchase a home in. Lowering standards has not aided O.C. in any way, shape or form. All you need to do is ask a shop owner on the Avenue or look around at the type of businesses that have moved into O.C. and the businesses that have left O.C.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
steef June 18, 2013 at 08:27 am
one more thing, it seems to be permanently formatted for a smart phone. i have all of this extraRead More real estate on the right of my screen. if we're not careful, some developer is going to pick it up and put 8 duplexes over there!!!