City Asks Voters to Join Fight Against Repeal of Beach Tag Fees

Ocean City would have to make up for the loss of $4 million in beach tag revenue.

City Council unanimously passed a resolution Thursday opposing a Senate bill that would require beach towns that accept state or federal money for beach replenishment to provide free beach access to the public.

Ocean City  to offset the cost of cleaning beaches and providing lifeguards, and the council resolution called the proposed bill "an unfunded mandate."

Sea Isle City Mayor Len Desiderio opened Thursday's meeting at the Ocean City Free Public Library with an update on what Cape May County is doing to fight the proposed legislation.

He said six mayors (Ocean City, Sea Isle City, Avalon, Stone Harbor, Cape May and Cape May Point) have drafted a letter expressing their opposition to the bill and outlining the potentially devastating impact on local budgets.

"It will be impossible to meet the 2 percent cap," Desiderio said. "We are communities that give far more to Trenton than we receive back."

Desiderio also encouraged local taxpayers to write or call the bill's sponsors, Democratic Senate President Stephen M. Sweeney and Republican Senator Michael J. Doherty, to let them know taxpayers are voters and that they oppose the measure. He also suggested contact Cape May County's Senator, Jeff Van Drew, who opposes the bill, and local Assembly representatives Matthew Milam and Nelson Albano.



Mayor Jay Gillian and Councilman Keith Hartzell accused the senators of pushing the ill-advised measure to gain political favor.

Sweeney had said New Jerseyans "shouldn’t be taxed a second time just to walk on the sand.”

“It is likely that state and federal taxpayers will provide hundreds of millions of dollars to repair and replenish New Jersey beaches that were washed away during Hurricane Sandy,” Doherty said. “Considering the massive public resources that will be directed at rebuilding many New Jersey beaches, it only seems fair to ensure that everyone have the opportunity to enjoy free access to the beaches they will support and help rebuild with their tax dollars.”

The legislation, S-2368, would apply to towns that accept grants or aid from the state or federal governments after Nov. 2 for replenishing storm-damaged beaches.

The bill is still at the committee level and would likely not be considered further until the new legislative session in 2013.

"The very people most affected by Sandy are going to pick up the bill," Hartzell said last week. "It's going to get paid on our citizens' and taxpayers' backs. To think we're going to pick up $4 million is ludicrous."

Ocean City spent $3,963,000 in 2010 to provide lifeguards, beach tag inspectors, insurance, beach replenishment, dune construction and daily maintenance. But it brought in only $3,428,000 in beach tag revenue.

That $500,000 gap lead to a $5 increase in the cost of seasonal beach tags in 2011.

"Our beach fees relate very closely to our costs of operating the beach," Business Administrator Mike Dattilo said.

JJ December 14, 2012 at 03:27 AM
Issue beach tags for no charge to ALL residents / homeowners but require a "tag of some sort" to return to the streets of OCNJ kind of like a "toll" where they can enter the beach for FREE but they must pay upon departure. Once they pay that fee for the day (either by leaving the boardwalk stairs or beach exits) they can depart again by showing the exit voucher they are given that day or if they pay a greater amount they can "seasonally leave" the beach etc. Just my two cents as a way around fighting the issue at hand.
JR December 14, 2012 at 04:47 AM
Ocean city home owners (tax payers) should not have to pay to use the beaches!!!!!
LGR December 14, 2012 at 01:02 PM
Just a thought. If you pay property taxes, then receive 2 tags, and pay for more. Renters (like me), visitors, should pay for tags. We have to have the revenue to pay for our beaches, life guards, and the upkeep.
Cindy Nevitt December 14, 2012 at 07:18 PM
So what you pay property taxes? This is about how BEACH TAGS pay for the cost of operating and maintaining the beaches. Property taxes do not go toward those costs. So how do you justify wanting a free pass because you pay taxes? Completely illogical. Pay the beach tag fee or your MUCH HIGHER property taxes will pay for the costs the beach tags currently pay. I buy two tags every year and haven't been to the beach since the early 1990s. That's my choice. I consider it an annual contribution to the city completely separate from my property taxes.
Wyatt December 14, 2012 at 08:44 PM
Boy this would be an administrative nightmare, requiring increased indirect costs to be absorbed by the program. The present tag system works just fine, lets put our efforts into getting the proposal defeated rather than trying to structure some convoluted mess to try and dodge the intent of the proposals.
Wyatt December 14, 2012 at 08:55 PM
The locals whining to get free beach tags because they are taxpayers just don't get it. The theory behind the legislation is that "taxpayers" namely federal and state who, through their taxes fund beach replenishment shouldn't have to pay more to get on such a beach. This is the same theory espoused by the locals, "we pay (local) taxes so shouldn't have to pay for a beach tag". So how can such locals be against the legislation? The only way the legislation differs from these locals' theory is that it broadens the definition of who is a taxpayer. Look at the figutes quoted above which are for 2010. After the resultant fee increase local property taxes absorb a miniscule amount of beach related costs, if any. This further invalidates these locals' theories that they are paying for the beach through their local taxes, so should get on them free..
Kevin D. December 15, 2012 at 01:48 AM
Funny how all of sudden the second home owners that are taxpayers are being asked to cast a "vote" on supporting collection of beach tag fees. Interesting how us 2nd class citizens all of sudden are needed to help in supporting the community. Not a challenge - just a thought. The irony is interesting.
fr,sp,aj December 15, 2012 at 02:04 AM
I just think it i a good time for me to start a little group and become the chairman, of course. Now that it is clear that everyone wants to pay for beach tags, my group will be called the committee to preserve beach tags. I am going to stick with the sure wins right now and leave the lost causes to others to front in my behalf. I can use people, it is one of my talents.
fr,sp,aj December 15, 2012 at 02:08 AM
And excuse me, Kevin D. I resent 2nd homeowners ever giving an opinion about anything. I can control the locals but these 2nd homeowners can be very independent thinkers. Makes people like me nervous.
Wyatt December 15, 2012 at 11:26 AM
This is not an "all of a sudden" thing. We have always been expected to "support the community" but just financially while staying out of town so the locals can enjoy thier uncroweded off season life style all year long.
Kevin D. December 15, 2012 at 12:50 PM
Wyatt, I stand corrected. What was meant to be said is that suddenly our vote/input counts. That is the irony. Appreciate your having clarified things.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »