The new Hospitality Zone - a model for increased density of development.

This is a repost.  I found two instances of this blog on Patch and in trying to delete the one inadvertently deleted both.  Apologies to the person who commented since comments were also deleted.  I tried to incorporate the gist of those comments.

Remember when in relation to the recent ordinance to remove the parking and attic areas from floor area ratio I saw it as a precursor to an increase in the density and intensity of development in the new Hospitality Zone?  The Planning Board has now gone on record as stating that it’s OK with greater density in the old Off Boardwalk and Hotel / Motel Zone (the new Hospitality Zone.)  Just prior to passing the Hospitality Zone on to Council it was tweaked to allow for even greater building coverage, less pervious coverage, and construction on smaller sized lots.  It was stated that increased density is a requisite for redevelopment in the Hospitality Zone.  The provisions of the ordinance also increase the intensity of development. 

Permissible building height is increasing into the 50 foot range.  And according to what I heard the new zone designation will allow for construction on less than 30 foot lots.  The permitted uses in the Hospitality Zone are hotel / motel, B&B’s, boarding houses, retail.  So it kind of makes you wonder why they’re reducing minimum lot size and allowing for construction on less than 30 foot lots.  It doesn’t seem consistent with the intended use does it?  Neither is an increase in density consistent with the stated goals of the Master Plan Re-exam.

Yes residential will be allowed in the new Hospitality Zone as long as it replaces residential that is already there.  I could take solace from that if it wasn’t for the fact that according to the City Planner 63% of what is in that zone now is nonconforming residential.  Or to put it another way out of the 242 parcels in that zone 153 are nonconforming residential.  That is staggering to me.  Of those 153 nonconforming residential properties 11 are single family.  So if you want to know who is in the driver’s seat in this town those numbers say it all.  Redevelopment of the residential in that zone will be accomplished by weakening the constraints on building height, overall building size, minimum lot size, allowable building coverage, floor area (particularly in relation to lot size), and non-impervious coverage.

Most people I talked to don’t feel that Hotel / Motel will fly in Ocean City.  Some say motels are a relic of the past.  Beach houses?  B&B’s?  Anyone’s guess.  So the more I think about it the more I’m convinced that this ordinance is targeted at redevelopment of the 63% residential, and that that redevelopment will come at the cost of an increase in both the intensity and density of development; both in the number of buildings squeezed into a block and the size of those buildings.  Aren’t we over developed enough?

That being said it was refreshing to hear that the goal is to increase density and intensity of development for the sake of the same.  I thought we only did that to make stuff conforming … to increase off street parking … to create “more affordable single family homes.”  So I appreciate the honesty (as far as it goes.)  But is a further increase in the intensity and density of development good for Ocean City?

The Corinthian model was proposed for the new Hospitality Zone as a “one size fits all.”  I drive thru that area of town on my way to work and I have to tell you it has severe parking and flooding problems.  Our infrastructure is already overwhelmed by decades of over development and neglect.  Maybe we ought to cool it with another round of yet more intense development until we address the problems we already created as a result of over development?

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Eric Sauder October 04, 2013 at 04:59 AM
It was a vote on the original version of the Hospitality Zone ordinance years ago that was tabled at the 11th hour when the Board of Realtors requested more time to review it. It was this same ordinance that prompted the comment, by a member of the Planning Board at the public presentation of the Master Plan re-exam, that in all his years working as a professional planner and sitting on Planning Boards, it was a first in his experience that a planning document had to receive the approval of a Board of Realtors or Chamber of Commerce. In the intervening years the ordinance has altered to the point where it now, apparently, does meet their approval. A Planning Board should not function as an agent of, or rubber stamp for the development community. Its purpose is to ensure responsible land use and to function as a check and balance to market driven development. No one seems interested in this, that's obvious. The development plan that was put into place will significantly increase density on this island. Although you don't see the evidence of it yet, its already been accomplished by the passage of these ordinances into law.
Eric Sauder October 04, 2013 at 05:04 AM
It is quite clear to me, and it should be clear to anyone who has any interest in it, just who is driving the bus.
Eric Sauder October 04, 2013 at 05:08 AM
There were people from the development community sitting in on Planning Board committee meetings working on these ordinances.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »