Campaign finance reports show that the political committee opposing the BYOB initiative in the May 8 election has far more money to spend than the group supporting BYOB.
The Committee to Preserve Ocean City lists $11,556 in contributions on its required 29-day pre-election report, while the Friends of Shop, Dine and Play in Ocean City list $3,846.75.
The committees are campaigning on opposite sites of a public ballot question in the May 8 municipal election. The public will vote on an ordinance that would allow diners to bring their own beer or wine to restaurants in Ocean City, where "Bring Your Own Bottle" (BYOB) is prohibited.
The 29-day reports were released by the state on Monday, April 16, and at the time neither committee had filed a complete report.
The Committee to Preserve Ocean City filed a report that showed no detail on contributions or expenses. Committee Treasurer Ken Cooper said he mailed the complete report later last week, but it was returned as undeliverable. He said he sent the report again by overnight mail on Monday. The state Election Law Enforcement Commission had not posted the new report as of Wednesday, but Cooper provided a copy to Ocean City Patch.
The Friends of Shop, Dine and Play had filed no report in time for deadline. They submitted a complete report later last week, and the state posted it on Monday morning.
ELEC requires candidates and political committees to file reports identifying anybody who makes a contribution greater than $300 or a cash contribution of any amount. Political committees must disclose all expenditures, regardless of amount.
"The essence of democracy is an informed electorate," ELEC says in its mission statement. "It is the fulfillment of this goal that the New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission (ELEC) embraces as its valued mission."
Committee to Preserve Ocean City
The political committee opposing the BYOB initiative lists $2,138 in contributions of $300 or less, and $9,418 in donations greater than $300 and cash donations.
Among the committee's major contributors are five members of the Ocean City Tabernacle Association Board of Trustees (who donated as individuals). The Tabernacle's roots stretch to the Methodist ministers who founded Ocean City as a religious retreat and dry town. The current trustees who donated include:
- Mary Anne Kull: Kull made separate contributions of $1,000 and $4,000. The Richard and Mary Anne Kull Youth Center at the Ocean City Tabernacle was named in 2008 in honor of its benefactors. The Kulls have donated generously also to Shore Memorial Hospital, the Ocean City Theatre Company and other local organizations, along with Republican candidates including Frank LoBiondo.
- Eric Hostvedt: Hostvedt donated $1,000. He is owner of HPI Sales LLC of Doylestown, Pa.
- Todd Chamberlain: The CEO of Masters Legacy Planning of Linwood, NJ, donated $598.
- Gena Willard: The accountant from Doylestown, PA, donated $300.
- Louis M. Walters: The president of Atlantic City Sewerage Co. made two donations of $250 apiece.
Other contributors included former Mayor Henry "Bud" Knight ($500) and Crab Trap Restaurant owner Kenneth Wallace ($1,000). The Crab Trap is a popular Somers Point restaurant with a liquor license just on the other side of the Route 52 causeway.
The committee lists $4,827.53 in expenses, paying Signal Graphics for postcards and a mailing. The committee shows a closing balance (at the time of the report) of $6,728.47.
Friends of Shop, Dine and Play in Ocean City
The political committee supporting the BYOB initiative lists $885 in contributions of $300 or less, $500 in donations greater than $300 and an in-kind contribution of $2,423.75.
The committee's contributors include:
- Leslie Skibo: The retiree and president of Community Art Projects donated $500.
- Jeff Sutherland: The committee's attorney made an in-kind contribution of legal services worth $2,423.75
The committee's expenses include $640 for advertising on Ocean City Patch, and the committee lists a closing cash balance of $727.54.
Required 11-day pre-election reports are due on Friday, April 27, and ELEC is scheduled to release the reports the following week.
Duffer
6:42 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I've been predicting a 3 to 1 vote against all along.
Eric Sauder
8:32 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Yes Duffer I know. I personally think its going to be closer than that (but who can say?) The anti-BYOB group is run like a political machine. It has city officials backing it and money pouring in from their friends in the private sector (and now from the proprietirs of restaurants in the bay towns who dont want competition). They have their signs all over the place. I suspect they could get George W. relected. What you have on the other side is a largely citizen's movement. In the end it is the people who will decide the issue. The anti-BYOB force has done a good job of telling people what to think and what to fear but not all of us are so susceptible. If it gets voted down it gets voted down. I just hope it won't be because of irrational fears.
Eric Sauder
8:33 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
We're better than that aren't we?
Richard Jacoby
7:06 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Have no idea which way this thing turns out. Predictions can’t be made based on the amount of money that the Anti-side raised since most of the money they raised was through a few large donations. I had to laugh when I saw the Crab Trap as one of the major donors on the opposition. It seems the Somers Point restaurants don’t want BYOB. I wonder why?
Richard Jacoby
7:26 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Surely the opposition to BYOB will renounce the fact that outside businesses and Pa residents are major contributors to their cause. They have been so out spoken in opposition to the fact that nonresident OC business owners and other nonresidents were the ones pushing for BYOB.
Eric Sauder
7:50 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Could it be that some of those contributions came from members of our chamber of commerce who acquired JR's liquor liscense and have plans for building a new "Jimmy Buffet" style restaurant / bar in Somers Point? If you want to know who they are check out the article in the Sentinnel.
Eric Sauder
9:07 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Shouldn't members of our Chamber of Commerce be promoting investment in Ocean CIty?
NoBYOB
9:21 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
The members of the Ocean City REGIONAL Chamber of Commerce should be promoting investment in the REGION. Why do we think that dollars that are spent in Ocean City stay in Ocean City and that dollars spent in Somers Point don't find there way over the bridge.
Eric Sauder
9:48 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I'm not sure what your point is, other than that's it's a regional CoC. From my way of thinking it would be good for Ocean CIty if the money did stay in Ocean CIty, which is part of the reason I'm backing BYOB. If, as you say, it's a regional CoC, they should build their facilities in Somers Point. Thta is, after all, where commerce is taking place. Let the taxpayers of SP build the thing. They're the ones who are deriving the benefit.
OCMYTH
10:14 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I guess you could say the dollars spent in Somers Point are in the region. But they are different counties, and taxes collected in those respective counties go to projects within the county. So, no, money spent in Ocean City doesn not directly benefit Somers Point residents, nor does it work in reverse. And Eric, the liquor license from JR's I believe went to Windjammer.
NoBYOB
10:28 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
My point is that we live and work in a REGIONAL economy. Do you think that everyone that works only works in Ocean City? No of course not. Do you know when the busiest time for traffic coming into town is? And this is according to traffic count data, not people standing on the bridge counting cars but actual machines put down on the road...The pro-BYOB people are correct that the busiest time leaving town is around between 4-6, however the busiest time coming into town is 8am. That means people are coming into our town and taking money out of our town, presumably to home...oh no. But guess what Eric? I know people that work over in Somers Point, Northfield, EHT, Atlantic City, Upper Township, etc, but live in Ocean City. So they bring money from those towns into Ocean City, just like the tourist. The point is that Money spent in Ocean City doesn't always stay in Ocean City, money Spent in Somers Point doesn't stay in Somers Point. That is how our economy works and Thank God for that. If every city lived in it's own little closed economy like you are somewhat advocating ("good for Ocean CIty if the money did stay in Ocean CIty") we would have no tourist in the summer. Because Philadelphia money would stay in Philadelphia.
Eric Sauder
10:31 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Yeah, I remembered that after I posted. If I recall correctly that investment group is still looking for one. Thanks. My bad.
OCMYTH
11:27 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
NOBYOB, I respect the commentary. However, when you talk about regional economy than you must also talk about seasonal economy. And Ocean City businesses which I believe is the point behind the BYOB movement to keep business in town not earnings of employees. As with a large portion of Cape May County (OC, Sea Isle, Avalon, Stone Harbor, Wildwoods, Cape May), these are seasonal economies and competed vigorously for every dollar. Look at the competitive nature of the golf course industry alone in those neighboring counties. With every dollar lost to Somers Point, and Atlantic City it hurts the regional economy. Less tax money earned for public projects. And by no means am I suggesting that BYOB would save, let alone even help OC. OC's problem and maybe its not a problem, it is a shore seasonal town. Nothing wrong with that. To make it a vibrant competitive year round town, it needs 100 fixes before they even consider byob.
Surfsup
12:08 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Look who's funding the no's, Business people that want to open a bar in SP, the largest Restaurant in SP. People from out of state that don't live here.
And the licence from JR's did not go to Windjammers, read the legal notice in the AC Press. It went to Brian Broadly, Scott Halladay, Gary Jessel, and others. ALL current and past presidents of the Chamber of Commerce. All actively fighting BYOB in Ocean City. If restaurants can survive here with out it, why aren't they opening a restaurant on the ground that Scott Halladay bought on ninth street. Wake up people, the people funding the No's have their own agenda's and it's not the welfare of the downtown or the City
OCMYTH
12:31 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Surfsup, on the Somers Point gov website, it says the licences was transferred to Windjammer corp. And that the other people have applied for a license. Not sure whats up there. Anyway, of course there are hidden agendas by those people. H and L, not only ruined the island with their 1,000 plus ugly, non descript and frankly, inferior made duplexes all over the island. Given that they are only general contractors and do little to none of the actual work, check with their sub contractors and see how many get paid in a timely fashion. I know one prominent in town retailer who was his subcontractor for years and routinely they would not pay for 6months.
Surfsup
12:58 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Their Attorney filed the legal notice two weeks ago and it states that its a transfer from Jr's. Their Attorney by the way is the same Attorney that did the Legal work for the NoBYOB people. Intresting isn't it!
Eric Sauder
8:03 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
It would appear that the owner of the Crab Trap (where so many residents of Ocean City dine) is also of the opinion that BYOB willmake Ocean City's restaurants more competitive.
Ellen
10:24 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
You've got to be joking. Crab Trap threatened by eating places (aka restaurants ((lol))) in OC? However if I owned a restaurant in Somers Point I would have campaigned against BYOB too. As a business owner I wouldn't want to lose any money to the other side of the bridge even if it only amounted to $5K a year.
Joanne
4:17 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
What happened to the NOBYOB position that we are a REGIONAL economy. I guess the Crab Trap owner's didn't buy that argument anymore than those of us on this side of the bridge did. They were willing to put up one thousand dollars to try to defeat BYOB. Ocean City Tourist money should stay in Ocean City to benefit OC merchants. How many people come to visit Somers Point in the summer? Right only for dinner or to get on the parkway and have dinner in Avalon, Stone Harbor or Cape May where they can also shop those towns cute stores that stay open after 5pm on a summer night!
Sunny Demeanor
8:34 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
If only people who own vacation homes in OC were permitted to vote! I guarantee the outcome would be very different...
Ellen
10:17 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
meaning?
OCMYTH
10:31 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
the implication, and if the posts for the last few months are any indication, that the full time resdients are opposed to the ordinance while second home owners would favor it. Who knows if that is true, because it's been about 100-150 posters, not nearly enough of a sample size. The prediction is that its not even close on May 8th. I am neither for or against, while I do not see the downfall of the town if it is passed, I still have not seen any hard economic evidence how it will help the town. And since it can (in my opionion) neither hurt nor help, you may as well leave it alone. I still would like to see an economic plan to help the WHOLE town, not just the eateries.
Sunny Demeanor
8:55 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
'Meaning' that this town is supported in large part by a tax base that has no vote! And I believe that most 2nd home owners are indeed in favor of BYOB. I think part of the reason is become many of them come from other towns where they have seen the BYOB model work successfully :)
Robert McKenna, MIKE
8:36 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
First a few months ago the city wanted to raise the height of buildings downtown to make Ocean City better for investors. Now its BYOB in restaurants. Eventually, BYOB will lead to open liquor sales like all the towns around us. Finally, the result, there will be very little difference between us an Ocean City MD, or Seaside Heights, or Wildwood. There are more than a few people out there that look at OC as virginal business territory ready to be exploited at the expense of the family residents. Once it starts it never stops until the OC you grew up in is no longer recognizable.
Eric Sauder
8:47 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Mike you really need to bone up on BYOB. I understand you're expressing your opinion and you have every right to. No one here (that I know of) wants to turn OCNY into OCMD (unless its the developers that line their pockets from tearing stuff down and rebuilding it). I understand your concerns about the increased height, but there is no reason to think that BYOB will lead to liquor sales.
JK
9:12 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
or it could turn it into Avalon or Stone Harbor...
The Ocean City that I grew up in is no longer recognizable anyway. Most of the single family homes are gone and are now all duplexes. I can hardly find the street I grew up on.
NoBYOB
9:18 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Eric, It HAS happened before, why can't it happen here? Rutherford, NJ is a prime example, the local government allowed BYOB in 1986 on the promise of nicer restaurants and more successful restaurants, and when that didn't work, 3 years later, they voted to allow liquor licenses. Of course I recognize Ocean City and Rutherford are to different places. Ocean City is already successful, why are we trying to fix something that isn't broken. So, IF BYOB were to pass and not deliver as the evidence (and lack of evidence suggests) suggest on the implied promises of a more vibrant downtown, better restaurant, more year round restaurant, then what?
Eric Sauder
9:27 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
In my opinion Mike it will not happen here primarily because the people of this town don't want bars and clubs and liquor stores. There are many other reasons, but that in and of istelf will keep it from happening. The number of liquor liscenses we could qualify for is limited by state law (acording to population). I've heard both one and three (I believe three is correct). Since there would be so few the cost of acquiring a liquor liscense would be prohibitive. Finally it would require an act of our government to apply for the liquor liscenses, and if that were to happen you'd probably see our representatives tarred and feathered and run out of town.
happycamper
9:29 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
the ocean city that i grew up in IS no longer recognizable.
Eric Sauder
9:39 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Some of us are trying to alter the course Deb. If you vote here you can effect the outcome. There are candidates running who represent the status quo, and then there are condidates that are independent and want to challenge it. Figure out who's who and get out there and VOTE.
Eric Sauder
9:54 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Time for a new mantra noBYOB. Your questions have been answered (and your position refuted) time and time again.
Duffer
10:09 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Questions, what questions??? I never had questions. I have an opinion that BYOB is no good for OC. I have my view and you have yours. There are more people....alot more.....who don't want BYOB. The vote will back that up. At some point you will have to get over it.
Eric Sauder
10:26 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Questions are those things with an "?" at the end. Read the prior post.
If it gets voted down it gets voted down. It would be unfortunate (I think) for Ocean City, but the people will have spoken.
Doris Randalls
10:12 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I own a vacation place in Ocean City and I bought there because it is a dry, family town. I have fond memories of Ocean City dating back to my childhood, and my adult children feel the same way. If I could vote, I would definitely vote against BYOB.
Joanne
4:19 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
Even if BYOB passes, OCEAN CITY WILL STILL BE A DRY TOWN! By definition a dry town is one that does not sell alcohol!
Wyatt
10:45 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Not sure why folks think second homeowners here would vote for BYOB. For the most part they like things as they are otherwise they would have invested in their second homes elsewhere. They pbobably don't really care, they aren't here much in the off season when is the stated target of the pro BYOB folks. And when they, and their tenants, are here they have learned that the OC restaurants are shovel fried fish and potatoes into the shoobies and turn the tables quickly places. And, being mostly southenders they have to drive to a restaurant anyway. So why not go to a place out of town where experience has shown they're more likely to get a nicer meal. Most second homeowners would not bother to come here to vote, or go to the trouble of getting an absentee ballot. No matter which way this goes it won't affect them very much, so they don't really care.
DTK
2:58 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
2nd home owners, like full time voting residents, have varying opinions..... some are for BYOB; some are against..... why do we keep stereotyping people to fit our issues? and i am a second home owner who IS here a LOT in the off season.... and, yes, i would bother to come here to vote... i pay a LOT of taxes without any kind of representation.... why do you speak for an entire large diverse group of people? many who are not PA residents.... and, yes, no matter which way it goes, i hope it goes quickly.... the negative nasty publicity from the unpleasant debate is bringing more bad press to OC than a bottle of wine ever could..... stop the nastiness.... just vote! and how about letting the 2nd home owners at least have a seat on the council???
Parker Miller
12:58 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Eric,
How can you possibly call the anti-BYOB a Chamber of Commerce group when 100's of citizens have made donations and put signs on their properties, and call the BYOB group a citizens group when the whole thing was started by a few failing OC restaurant owners who are having trouble competing with better OC restaurants?
Eric Sauder
11:54 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Sorry Parker. It just occurred to me that you might not know that the partners in this enterprise are three individuals who are currently, or were in the recent past, president of the CoC. I hope that lends perspective to my comment. Further what I posed was a question. I don't know the answer.
Eric Sauder
2:00 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
I did not call the anti-BYOB group a CoC group. I asked if the same members of the CoC that are involved in a partnership to build a restaurant / bar in Somers Point are also donating to the anti-BYOB group in Ocean City. I see that as being problematic if true (you might not). That was the only association I made between the two.
You were right to question the differentiation I made between the two groups (the pro and anti-BYOB). In my opinion (and to a considerable degree in fact if you know who’s supporting which group) the anti-BYOB group is made up of members of city government (past and present) as well as members of organizations associated with it. It was judgmental on my part to say that the pro-BYOB group is more of a citizen’s movement, but by way of comparison it seems that way to me; it is not made up of people from the government faction. Clearly there are citizens supporting both sides. Not all of the pro-BYOB people are restaurant owners. That’s just how it looks to me, but I probably should have kept my perspective to myself. If I'm the only citizen supporting the initiative (outside of the restaurant owners) then I suppose you could argue that the anti-BYOB group is the populist group. Maybe that is true
Charlene
6:13 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
All i can say is I PROUDLY have my NO BYOB sign in my window and i am voting NO. I moved here because of Ocean City being a dry town and i will fight to keep it that way. This town is family oriented and having alcohol would change the structure here. It would not happen over night but it will happen if the BYOB is passed.
drinktheockoolaid
7:39 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Good for you charlene. Even better if you think this is a dry town. If what you meant is you moved here because there are no sales of alcohol permitted in town than great. BYOB would still accomplish that, since no sales would be here. Also funny if you think it is as family oriented as you think, talk to some police or people in town and find out for this samll town how rampant the drug use is in town. Especially throughout the high school. So once May 8th comes and you vote and BYOB is successfully defeated you could spend some of your time in attacking some of the real problems this town is facing, including the absolute decimation of the downtown business district. (Which byob wouldnt help anyway)
Robert McKenna, MIKE
7:48 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Eric, I agree with you most of the time on many issues, but to say it won't happen here that people here are different, is only because we never had BYOB before. It is a crack in the dam that the realtors and other business people will use to usurp from the residents their quaint little beach community out from under them, all legal and all business. The residents be damned. It happened already with the duplexes and quads located where charming little beach cottages used to be. Remember when you could see the ocean from Asbury ave? I do, and those days are gone. My point... give the business community an inch, and they will take it all. JK, makes good points that support my belief. This is foremost a residential community, let's remember the beauty in the town, and how greed could change everything, slowly at first, but as aggressive as cancer wants it starts.
Eric Sauder
11:39 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Do you think the people you mentioned can ram liquor liscenses down the throats of the people of this town if they oppose it? If you do I can see your point. I just don't see how that is possible.
happycamper
8:13 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Ocean City did have BYOB before . . . and we are all still here and there are no liquor stores.
NoBYOB
8:28 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
deb,
That's not correct, according to The Sentinel Ledger-March 1, 1984 the "patrons who possessed or drank alcohol were subject to fine and-or jail sentence. The penalty would be $500 fine and-or 90 day jail sentence.” (hardly legal) During the March 1, 1984 the city council changed the law so that the penalty was as it is now on the restaurants. Don't take my word for it you can read it for yourself at: http://nobyob.com/reasons/fact-check/1984-2/
Surfsup
8:44 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
And we all know that if it was written in the paper it must be true! Read the LAW not the newpaper. They can spin this anyway they want. Right now the major supporters of the No's are getting ready to open their own BAR in SP. Another major supporter owns the largest restaurant on the other side of the bridge. And even more of the No's made their money from the destruction of old Ocean City into a sea of duplexes. But yet only the people that want to support our downtown and year round residents enjoying a glass of wine/beer are labeled as greedy restaurant owners.
Anna
8:56 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Don't you all find it interesting that the heavy hitter donors to the Anti-BYOB Campaign either do not live in Ocean City or are not full time residents???
BET
10:45 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
come on May 8th............. this has got to stop............ all of that money could have gone to charity.............. but NO............. instead it went to Doug Bergen..... and all the sign makers............................ OC please stop the insanity ....... just stop.
BET
10:48 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
just vote
Robert McKenna, MIKE
4:42 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
Let's not confuse the issue with drugs in the High School. What HS in America does not have a drug problem? Even Ocean City High School that has to bus the kids into town to justify the school's existence. Follow the money and you will see who wants BYOB. When it is all said and done it is about the money. BYOB does nothing for the residents. The vote is coming, and it is obvious where I stand, not because I am against booze, God Forbid, but rather because I do not trust our city government and where this bill will take us in the years to come.
koolaid
11:42 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
Robert, the point of the drug issue was the implication that this is a family town and byob would be the demise of such a family oriented environment. Meaning that a town with a full time population of leass than 10,000 has a rampant drug problem, decimation of the business district and a real estate to earning ration prohibiting it from becoming a full time residential community. So, yes it was relevant to point out the other issues in this town that arent' as rosy as they seemed. Can this town be a great one, it certainly has the potential. But it is not headed in the right direction.
Eric Sauder
11:08 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
I tried to approach the discussion with logic and reason. I was told (by another blogger some weeks ago) that that approach would fail. He also stated that people will only listen to arguments that support their own position (and shut out the rest). Truer words were never spoken. I’m kind of disgusted with it now. I tried. Thank you for the advice.
I’ve been trying to affect positive change here in Ocean City for years now, and it has been an uphill climb. But if logic and reason cannot prevail I must admit that I am powerless to do so. In any event I don’t want to get caught up in a circular argument that can never reach its end. There are other issues in this town that are (in my opinion) more important than BYOB.
There's nothing left to do now but vote (and suffer the consequences).
Joe Fontombon
11:21 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
The screwballs that think BYOB will "revitalize" the downtown are deluded. It's all a dream based on marketing the glory years of Asbury Avenue. Time was, ALL stores were open on Wednesday AND Friday nights, till 9! Before Searstown, and the Hamilton Mall. How many of you stopped shopping at Leon's, Staintons, Mayer's, Dixon's, etc... in favor of the new malls and box stores? It's a last-gasp bailout for restaurant owners who can't bother to change their marketing, menus, or advertising. Look at the lines at Luigis, Piccini, the crazy crowds at Sack-O-Subs and Voltacos. We're a seasonal resort. Get it?? It's sad that people are willing to risk so much for so very, very little. Failure rate for new businesses is around 60% nationally.
Joe Fontombon
11:30 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
On a side note, the Fontombons went to a new Asian restaurant by Marmora Shop-Rite two weeks ago, Saturday night. Had a 45-minute wait - two large parties just about dominated the small dining area. They were long finished eating, spent the 45 minutes finishing up their 12-packs of beer and multiple wine bottles. (I guess they walked home...right). Multiple parties (and their dollars) walked out after hearing the wait time. The take-out business was huge, which may be why the owner tolerated this rudeness in the dining area. I'll never dine there again, though the food was absolutely great. Is this what you want?
Andrea
12:24 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
I am neither for nor against BYOB. I have been vacationing in OCNJ since I was a child and am now 30 years old. There are really no concrete arguments for or against it. Everyone just assumes they know what it will or won’t lead to and what it will or won’t help, but you know all know what happens when one ASSUMES.
My parents have a second home in OCNJ and wish they could vote. Though people say this BYOB proposition is for the year round residents, it does affect the people who own 2nd homes in OCNJ. BYOB can affect their rental income so they should be allowed to vote on this and other things in OCNJ-they pay taxes like the year round residents do so why shouldn’t they have a say? Maybe it wouldn’t make a difference either way but they should have a vote.
Post continues below...
Andrea
12:25 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
Again, I don’t care either way if BYOB passes but just a few things to remember/consider and some questions. As you can see, there are points for either side of the argument.
1.If you want to keep the history and tradition of OCNJ alive then vote against BYOB.
2.However, change is not always a bad thing.
3.People have alcohol in OCNJ. They can’t drink it in public but they can end up being drunk in public. Either way OCNJ is not a completely “dry” town.
4.Ocean City does need some nicer restaurants- whether you can drink in them or not.
5.Even if it does pass, isn’t it up to each restaurant owner whether they will allow it in their establishment and how much? (couldn’t you make a rule- 1 bottle of wine per 2 people??)
6.Allowing BYOB does not necessarily lead to liquor licenses and bars/clubs
7.Allowing BYOB is not necessarily the economic solution that OCNJ needs and it won’t save the city and all the failing businesses.
Andrea
12:25 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
8.Allowing BYOB does not mean there will be an increase in public drunkenness or other problems-it is still a family resort. I know many families that have nice, civil meals with a glass of wine. I also know there are people out on the boardwalk that have drank a few in their homes before heading out for the evening. Drinking is drinking, no matter where it is done.
9. Is it worth it to wait 45 minutes for a table because people are nursing their glasses of wine?
10. If you can, go out and vote on May 8 so these debates can stop and people can move on and work on more important issues related to Ocean City and its improvement.
I love OCNJ and there is no other New Jersey beach I would want to vacation at. My husband and I are hoping to start a family soon and, BYOB or no BYOB, we will continue to vacation in OCNJ.
Now I'm done. Promise :) Sorry!
Richard Jacoby
3:40 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
Good post.
Allan Emenheiser
4:36 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
good post
marrianne
2:35 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
The Committee to preserve nastiness and ignorance is gaining ground! That's great for those who need to rehabilitate their reputations after jumping on the wrong bandwagon with the wetlands destruction. we are so thankful to have such fine up standing citizens who will protect the public from themselves this way. prohibition lives in ocean city. we are just thankful that Fasy stopped trying to destroy ocean city wetlands so he can use his time to save us from ourselves!
Andrea
4:38 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
Richard and Allan~Thank you! :)
Allan Emenheiser
4:43 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
Sorry, but I'm voting no. These failing restaraunts need to upgrade their menus if they want to compete. i miss affordable meals for a good price.BYOB is not going to bring back Leons, Staintons dept store, Sportsworld, etc.... having more year round residents revitalize a downtown. Ocean City killed Ocean City during the real estate boom and the raising of property taxes drove young families offshore. I live and work in town, grew up here and I love this town the way it was set-up. if i need a drink that bad, i go to somers point, mainly to escape for a few hours. I love the family aptmosphere and hope it doesn't change. No on 5/8
jennifer
10:23 am on Monday, April 30, 2012
It is just a blessing that the Committee to Preserve Nastiness and Ignorance is around to save us no good wine drinkers from ourselves. Of course where were they when the town was overtaken by the developers and the realtors wait a minute aren t they developers and or realtors yes the fools in oc allowing these hypocrites to lead them around on this no byob are a sad state of affairs
jennifer
1:44 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
and this committee to preserve oc (a real joke) is run by some of the biggest anti non residents around Pennsylvania 2nd homeowners are held in complete contempt by some of these guys who oddly enough make their living off the PA renters and buyers yes the hypocrisy is astounding BYOB may or may not get voted in now but eventually these guys will be out and BYOB will be in a matter of time
Eleanor
6:03 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Is this how the promoters of BYOB really want to sell their point to the public and to those who may be undecided?
"the committee to preserve nastiness and ignorance"
"a real joke"
"fools...hypocrites..."
Isn't it possible to just argue the issue? Whether or not OC should allow the restaurants that want it to offer a BYOB option without smearing people just because they don't have the same opinion you have? I think the only issues are - 1, whether BYOB will open the door to other issues (liquor sales), 2, whether limiting the restaurants to certain zones and excluding the boardwalk will bring on a potential challenge in court at the expense of OC taxpayers, 3, whether it will 'revive' downtown. The last issue is something i took a second look at - the downtown actually has a lot of stores, and very few that are closed up. It is the winter that you see more 'thanks for a great season'. I don't see - given our population and the limited appeal of coming to a shore town in the winter - how allowing BYOB itself can change that. I think the problem goes a lot deeper.
jennifer
4:47 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
NO Eleanor this is not an argument about BYOB or no BYOB this is strickly about the total hypocrisy of this committee and mostly its Chairman who was the leader of the pack to destroy Ocean City wetlands. Now how can you call yourself a preservationist under those circumstances? And once again, where were these preservationists when all the single homes were knocked down and replaced by condos and duplexes and triplexes and quads? That is what really changed OC from a nice yr round community into a summer money making machine. BYOB is really so unimportant one way or the other except to the restaurant owners and I feel for them in this tough business economy. It is these hypocrites who try to run this town and try to push everyone else around and who disparage 2nd homeowners that is so hard to take. So take it easy Eleanor and vote which ever way you want
Joanne
8:00 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
I took a ride down Asbury Ave YESTERDAY. Between 6 th st and 15th st. I counted 15 stores vacant. This doesn't count the plethora of mini stores forced on the first floors of the West Ave condos. Stores are no longer geared to the needs of year round residents only tourists and nail salons. We can have people return to the shore in the winter. As a child I remember my family making day trips to check on the shore house, taking a walk on the boardwalk and having something to eat at Hogates or Chris Restaurants before heading home. If we had BYOB restaurants people could do the same and then walk down the Avenue and shop! We had carriages rides this winter that rode the occupants past closed stores. A beautiful opportunity for business wasted! Everyone agrees alcohol is here, stop the hypOCrisy and help our economy grow again! Vote YES on May 8 and bring this city into the current century!
NoBYOB
8:42 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Joanne, So now downtown is between 6th to 15th Street? According to the Downtown website: "Ocean City’s thriving Downtown shopping district runs from 6th to 11th Street along Asbury Avenue and is home to over 100 unique shops, galleries and restaurants" Between 6th and 11th street there maybe 4 or 5 for rent signs, that's it. OUR YEAR ROUND POPULATION HAD SHRUNK, BYOB WILL NOT FIX THIS. You (and your group) have fail to show how BYOB will help the community or impact the community. You have said look at these unrealistic examples of towns with BYOB that are successful and fail to mention that they have 2 to 7 times the population that Ocean City has year round and are not resort towns. And now you expect our town of less then 50k people within a 5 mile radius should have a larger downtown with more shops then a town with 350k people within a 5 mile radius. PEOPLE SPEND MONEY, NOT BOTTLES OF WINE OR BEER. Ocean City is the most successful resort town town in NJ, why would you want to mess with success? Vote NO on May 8th and DON'T MESS WITH SUCCESS!
ocdowntown
11:01 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Nobyob, I agree that BYOB will not save or even help the downtown. I am neither for or against it, but I fail to see how it will generate anymore business.
Getting to the other issue that is now correctly being raised about the state of the downtown itself, I disagree, there are far more than 5 empty storefronts. The downtown is not thriving, and if you talked to most of the shop owners they will tell you most are hurting. You correctly point out the lack of foot traffic available year round to these businesses, and that is a major issue. How to get even a fraction of those within that 5 mile radius. The proposals being thrown around for Upper Township of a Target or WalMart shopping type plaza where the old car dealers are would absolutley kill the remaining downtown shopping. As I think a good portion of shoppers do come from Upper. I would love for the May 8th vote to happen, be done, and then have a serious discussion on revitalizing the WHOLE downtown, not the 6 eateries that want wine in their establishments.
Joanne
9:43 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
I find it amusing that our town spends so much effort to expand the downtown business area both down Asbury ave and with the West Ave "shops under the condos debacle", which EVERYONE now agrees was a big mistake but you conveniently shorten the business district and ignore West Ave to make your argument work. You also conveniently ignore Ocean Grove which is definitely a resort town and example of a place that has had success with BYOB. Success in a Methodist town even stricter than our OC.I say why can't what works in a larger model work on a smaller model? The road to the malls go two ways! If our residents can go there, the poulation around the malls can come shop in our downtown too. In fact you conveniently ignore or twist most solid supporting facts which have been given. Fear mongering is your method. BYOB will not make us a town full of staggering drunks. You convince people our town will have a reputation like Wildwood, and again ignore the fact we could be like Stone Harbor and Avalon and Cape May.You didn't want BYOB on the boardwalk and now complain that it isn't. The year round population has shrunk, we are offering a viable solution to try to lure them back. Of course what is missing in your " if it ain't broke" theory is that it is broken and needs fixing.
Joanne
9:49 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
You have offered no viable option except turning our down town into a technology business park using Johnson's popcorn Internet sales as a successful model. You have tried to capitalize on the fact that there is no written limit on the amount of beer and wine brought in knowing that the State prohibits us from putting that in the ordinance. You ignore the overwhelming number of responsible diners and foster the "bar-megedon" image . Hopefully come May 8th the numbers of voters who have kept their opinions to themselves for fear of retaliation will rise up and vote their conscience. VOTE YES ON MAY 8th!!
Eleanor
10:25 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
I think that for a downtown to thrive you have to offer a product that is not duplicated in a bunch of other shops and superior service. Look at Sea Oats - how have they managed to stay in business for decades? They figured out what to change and what should stay the same. What are Sun Rose, Accent Gallery, Boyars, Rauhausers, Sack o Subs doing that the Kitchen Connection, the bridal shop and last years bagel shop didn't do? There is a whole subject of how to revive the downtown that has little to nothing to do with BYOB which would not have helped out the ice cream shop on 10th & Asbury that folded, or Wards that does a healthy business. These are really two different discussions and if there is a link, it is one that the BYOB supporters have not made. That may be because OC is a unique community not only in location but in how it markets itself and it is hard to find an example of a successful equivalent where BYOB is instituted - Ocean Grove really is not the same, neither is Collingswood (I know both communities pretty well). I just haven't heard the 'If we allow BYOB, we will see improvement...because....' connection.
Joanne
1:16 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
The beauty of BYOB is that it keeps people and the dollars in town. When people and their kids go off island for dinner they are making an evening of it. Even if it is one or teo nights of their vacation.Here is the example of how all boats rise on a high tide. If a family goes off island for dinner, they are going to shop in those towns stores(Avalon,Stone Harbor, Cape Mayans yes even Wildwood!. ) for their soveniers, miniature golf and ice cream before getting in their car and driving back to OC. We have all of that here except the one thing that will keep them here for dinner.It is short sighted to blame the restaurant owners as the only ones that will benefit from BYOB. I wonder how all the shop owners south of 11th street on Asbury feel about NoBYOB declaring they are not part of the downtown shopping district because that's what the website says. Maybe the website could use an update too!
Eleanor
7:00 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
I think its an assumption that people 'make an evening of it' if they leave OC to dine especially if they are dining w/kids. Because the kids don't want to stroll around Cape May (where parking is such a nightmare that it is hurting business) or Stone Harbor (which is very quiet and 'adult'), they want to get back to the OC boardwalk. If I go to a restaurant in Upper or Somers Pt for dinner, I eat and come home. There is no place 'to make an evening of it' unless I decide to go to a movie in Northfield.
The OC boardwalk has marketed itself really well. Don't know who is over in Cape May or Stone Harbor but in the summer it is packed, so are the parking lots, so are the miniature golf courses.
And who has a shop south of 11th Street? F & M? Bennies? Bookateria? Boyars? An ice cream place or two and a couple take out restaurants. I don't know how they feel personally but it is hard to think that any of them would be impacted in any way by BYOB.
As for those families who are going over the bridge with their kids so that they can drink with their dinner and then driving around to spend money and then driving back over the bridge on a busy Saturday night? If that does not give you a 'what is wrong with this picture' moment, i don't know what does.
BET
1:42 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
7 more days..... everyone has kicked this horse to death........... give it a rest..... does anyone think a this point they are going to change anyone's mind............ lets move on to the fact that the firefighters ( avg $108,000 a year ) are working with the city for a new contract............................................. think about that .... you may need a drink
Parker Miller
4:26 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
I wonder if the downtown area should try to reinvent itself. Can a town of 11,700 with many leaving for several winter months support 100 Asbury stores? Only 4 or 5 are large enough to offer much variety or selection, and most of the others are specialty stores. Many are excellant specialty stores with good management that are suviving, but their merchandise if geared toward the tourist which is where they make the necessary profits in the summer.
jennifer
4:56 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Once again this town went from a year round community when the developers and realtors knocked down the single homes and put up condos and duplexes and triplexes and made a ton of money doing so. The taxes are high and retirees have a hard time living in OC This town is a ghost town during the winter but those in control make their money during the summer so it is ok by them to keep the status quo. It is short sighted but that is the way it is then you have the hypocrites of the century just trying to rehabilitate their own reputations by jumping on what they perceive as a winning issue being as pushy and obnoxious about this as they were about their last goal in OC preservationists??? hysterical not preservationists hyprocrites