patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

New Grant May Help Protect Beachfront Lots From Development

Ocean City gets a $300,000 matching grant that could possibly be used to help purchase the Schilling estate property at 19th Street.

 

The state Green Acres Program announced new funding on Tuesday that includes a $25,000 loan and a $300,000 matching grant that could help the city buy beachfront property at 19th Street to protect it from development.

Representatives of estate of Helen Schilling are seeking permission to build a luxury home on the land, while neighbors and other Ocean City residents oppose the idea of "building on the beach." The battle focuses on a unique stretch of undeveloped land along the Ocean City Boardwalk between 19th and 20th streets.

City Council passed a resolution in February that called for applying for the matching grant — with 25 percent ($300,000) coming from the state Green Acres program and 75 percent ($900,000) potentially coming from a group of neighbors interested in protecting the property from development.

Tuesday's announcement from the state Department of Environmental Protection's Green Acres Program puts one piece of the puzzle in place.

But in order for the property to be purchased and protected from development, the neighbors would still have to provide the $900,000 share and the estate would have to accept an offer in the range of the combined $1.2 million.

Richard Hluchan, the attorney representing the estate, said earlier this year that the estate remains open to any offer for "fair market value" on the three beachfront lots.

Hluchan represents the trustee (a BNY Mellon administrator) of the estate of Helen Schilling (who passed away in 1998). Helen and Charles Schilling (who died in 1980) had no children and no heirs, and the beneficiaries of her estate include Shore Memorial Hospital, Abington Hospital and the Ocean City Tabernacle.

The group of neighbors offered the estate $700,000 earlier this year, but their offer was turned down. A second and higher offer also was made.

Clement Lisitski, the Ocean City attorney representing the neighbors, said on Wednesday that he remains in discussions with Hluchan on a potential purchase price.

At the same time, Lisitiski said he has appealed the state Department of Environmental Protection's approval of the project in the state Appellate Divison and requested a hearing on the permit that would take place in the Office of Administrative Law.

__________

More on the Schilling estate:

__________ 

City Council met in an executive session on Thursday, Aug. 16, "to discuss the application to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection by the estate of Helen Schilling to obtain certain permits relating to a development proposal regarding 19th Street & Boardwalk."

With the following day the deadline to review of the DEP's permit for the project, City Council may have lended its support to Lisitski's request for a hearing.

The city outlined many of its concerns with allowing development on the property in a November letter to the state Department of Environmental Protection, which gave preliminary approval to a permit application for building on the property.

In the letter, Allegretto accused the state of bowing to the threat of a lawsuit and passing the potential cost of it to Ocean City. 

"Rightly or wrongly, the Final Analysis is seen by many as a rationalization to approve development on the subject property to avoid the risk of the State being liable to compensate the applicant if the original permit denial was unchanged," Allegretto wrote. "It follows in such reasoning that the State by approving development is unfairly exposing the City of Ocean City to the same liability intentionally avoided by the State."

The letter outlines Ocean City's objections:

  • Allowing building on the property could hurt Ocean City's chances of qualifying for future beach replenishment funding.
  • The state's analysis incorrectly suggests that the proposed house conforms to minimum zoning setbacks (the proposed building area is just five feet from the neighboring properties).
  • The state's analysis makes no mention that tidal waters flowed over the property before the beach replenishment project.
  • The state offers no explanation for why it's allowing a footprint (2,870 square feet) larger than any of the neighboring homes.
  • The state didn't complete any legitimate study of whether the property could be a habitat for nesting birds.
  • The analysis is inconsistent with previous rulings from the DEP related to properties in Ocean City.

The city could use the Green Acres grant to help eliminate its concerns about developing the property buy purchasing it for preservation.

Tuesday's grant announcement was part of almost $66.2 million in funding to local governments and nonprofit land trusts to acquire open space and develop parks throughout New Jersey, according to a news release from the state.

"Green Acres was created in 1961 to meet New Jersey's growing recreation and conservation needs," the release said. "Together with public and private partners, Green Acres has protected over 650,000 acres of open space and provided hundreds of outdoor recreational facilities in communities around the State. The total acreage of protected open space across the State now exceeds 1.4 million acres."

Related Topics: Green Acres Program and Schilling estate

Thatcher Baxter Hatcher

8:38 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Wow! The state can hold back money from public pensions but it has extra cash to protect the real estate investments of beach resort home owners! I love this country! I say don't waste the money. In 50 years global warming will turn that "beachfront" into seabed and nature will have given the protected owners their very own beachfront property...

Reply

Rombe Smythe

10:40 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

wow....Thatcher Hatcher...that can't be a real name? lol

Reply

Robert McKenna, MIKE

10:59 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

The Green Acres Program has been a great idea in NJ, the most populated per sq mile state in the union. The land in question only exists year in and year out because of all the work done by OC to reclaim the beaches and make safe beachfront properties. After this much work on the beachfront of Ocean City, why can't the City use the law of eminent domain? Obviously, I am not a lawyer, but I know if OC, or NJ, wants to build a road and your property is in the way they can take your property under the law of eminent domain. At the very least the city should come up with the difference from the state grant, and the neighbor's offer and purchase the property at fair market (for land that is in danger of going back underwater). The developers and Realtors do not run this town; OC should dictate the rules not them. And like Thatcher said this could all be a moot point as global warming moves beachfront property back to Bucks County, Pa.

Reply

Duffer

6:29 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

I don't want a single penny of my tax dollars or anyone else's to be spent to buy this land. So corrupt!!!!!!

Reply

Richard Jacoby

8:26 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

The neighbors don't want it because these homes would be built infront of their houses blocking their beach front view. These rich non resident neighbors can penny up the cash to buy the property on their own. Why must my tax dollars fund it.

Reply

Richard Jacoby

8:31 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Yeah. Robert. Lets just steal other people's property using eminent domain. Spoken like a true liberal.

Reply

Richard Jacoby

8:38 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Neighbors intersected in PROTECTING the land. What a crock of -hit. Penny up more cash until they want to accept. Don't make the taxpayer pay Duffer. Your right. Corrupt as hell.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SAS

9:39 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Nob.ody is corrupy here...both sides are entitled to what is right. . The neighbors involved paid beachfront taxes for close to 50 years....they surely have a right to preserve what the thought was beachfront. On the other hand,,since the Schilling's paid for their wet sand also, they should be compensated as such. Wet sand taxes were a couple hundred dollars. Mrs Schilling knew she couldn't build there..so she didn't...and didnt even try to in all the years that she owned these parcels. SO...keep in mind who IS trying to build.....a greedy estate..who no heirs. So sad!

SAS

10:03 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Hmmmmm...I'm guessing none of you own the homes that will be affected by this monstrosity being built in front of them. If you did, I'm sure you would all be the first ones to raise your hands and say ..build in front of me, please!! LOL. You would all be the first in line to block this. Open space needs to be preserved in OC..this town has become way too crowded for all who own here. That parcel was under sand for years and years. The sand there belongs to the city by way of beach replenishment. If the estate wants compensation on that property, they rightfully deserve it. BUT..not at $2 million...only the few thousand dollars they paid for wet sand for over 40 years.

Reply

Robert McKenna, MIKE

11:30 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Right on SAS!!! While Jacoby sees a liberal behind anything positive done for all the citizens of Ocean City, and Duffer acts like the tax dollars are coming directly out of his pocket, for once, this is a chance for the city to stand-up for the years of heard work they have done on beach restoration. The OC beach was eroding away, and full of trash and sea debris not too many years ago. OC cleans up the beach, protects the parcel of land from washing away, and now the Realtors, developers, and anyone else who sees money, instead of flood security holding back the ocean from storm surge, wants financially to gouge Ocean city and the concerned neighbors. I said before, I don't know when a town or state can use eminent domain, I don't like the concept of such a law, but if it helps all the people of OC, and applies in this situation, than OC should use it. If for no other reason, use it as leverage against the ridiculous sums of money being asked for a piece of sand that has been under water on several occasions. OC has felt the housing devaluation too in this country, the price asked is not reflecting the true value of wet beach sand. The net effect of a house or (God Forbid) house(s), built on this property will take away from the charm of the city as a whole, and certainly devalue the properties around such development, thus lowering the property taxes. Ocean Looses. Developers win again.

Reply

SAS

8:48 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

What fid Sandy do to this lot..anyone know? Did it fill with water or stay dry?

Reply

Leave a comment