BYOB Supporters in Ocean City Launch New Petition Drive
Petitioners seek a public vote May 8 on allowing "Bring Your Own Bottle" restaurants in the dry town.
A new petition calling for a public vote on allowing "Bring Your Own Bottle" (BYOB) restaurants in the dry town of Ocean City started circulating on Friday (Feb. 10).
A committee of petitioners met on Friday morning to finish plans for collecting signatures.
The petitioners face an early March deadline to collect 351 signatures (10 percent of the Ocean City votes cast in the November 2011 General Assembly election) in time to have the binding question included on the ballot for Ocean City's May 8 municipal elections.
Ocean City has prohibited the sale and public consumption of alcohol through laws and deed restrictions since its founding in the 1800s. But the petition's supporters see BYOB restaurants as a way to add to Ocean City's appeal as a year-round shopping and dining destination.
The issue has sparked a debate in the city — with many people passionate about preserving the status quo in a popular family resort.
A group of restaurant owners helped launch a petition drive last year and collected enough signatures to have the question put on the ballot for the election on Nov. 8, 2011. But fears that a recent court case in northern New Jersey may have invalidated at least part of their proposal led them to withdraw the petition before the fall election.
The old petition outlined a proposed ordinance and guidelines for BYOB in Ocean City (see story). The new petition satisfies the state guidelines that led the group to pull the proposal in the fall, and it eliminates the Boardwalk from the proposed areas where BYOB would be permitted.
"The biggest change is the Boardwalk," said Bill McGinnity, owner of Cousin’s Restaurant at 104 Asbury Ave. and vice president of the Ocean City Restaurant Association. "That was the No. 1 concern everybody had. So that's been eliminated."
__________
To see the new petition, click on the PDF icon above.
__________
McGinnity said the BYOB proponents have formed a political action committee — Friends of Shop, Dine and Play in Ocean City — to promote and support the BYOB initiative and larger efforts to market local businesses.
He said the PAC and the initiative can work hand-in-hand with a current effort to rebrand the downtown as a year-round destination.
"It's not just restaurants that want this," McGinnity said. "A lot of people are focusing on year-round island living and on not being so much of a one-trick pony. We want to push Ocean City as a year-round community. We want more people buying real estate here."
McGinnity said he understands the marketing value of Ocean City's reputation as a dry town, but he said he doesn't believe BYOB will diminish that brand.
"If they're bringing something forward, God bless them, but I want it to be the right ordinance," Mayor Jay Gillian said. "It's a democratic process."
He said he does not want Ocean City to go through the same divisive debate over the issue only to have the ordinance be illegal. He said that he's already received calls with questions from Boardwalk merchants and is researching whether it's legal to exclude them.
While Gillian supports the public's right to decide, he has been firm in his opposition to BYOB.
"One of the reasons we get so much notoriety is because of our family tradition of no alcohol," Gillian said. "It's who we are."
The committee of petitioners includes John Ball, Sharon Hoffman, Eleanor Parker, Aimee Repici and Joanne Bernardini
They announced the following schedule for anybody interested in signing the petition:
- 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. every Sunday at Captain Bob's (55th Street and Simpson Avenue)
- 5 to 8 p.m. Saturday, Feb. 18, at Captain Bob's (55th Street and Simpson Avenue)
- 4 to 8 p.m. Friday, Feb. 17, at the Chatterbox
- 8 and 10 a.m. Tuesday, Feb. 14, at Who's on First (First Street and Asbury Avenue)
(This story is developing. Check back for updates.)
__________
Follow Ocean City Patch on Facebook.
Subscribe to our Ocean City newsletter.
John Fischer
1:41 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Bill McGinnity is a fool if he thinks that BYOB will not diminish the Ocean City brand. Stop this nonsense and preserve one of the few places that caters to the family. I suppose you will want to legalize marijuana next.
Pat
1:53 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
And then they might want to give women the right to vote!!!!!!
Eleanor
2:03 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Look - i dont care if it is on the ballot. I may even sign a petition to get it there if i am around any of those places. But when i go into the voting booth it is a 'no' from me. I am all for the people in the town having the right to vote but i think that there is no evidence or any reason at all to think that BYOB will have any positive effect on Ocean City other than maybe giving a small boost to businesses that allow it but even that may be counteracted by less business due to slower table turnovers - drinkers do linger longer over dinner - and by people wh may have gone to certain places in the past but will not patronize BYOB restaurants.
And - i say 'one and done'. I would hate to see this referendum pop up again and again like the high school did if the 'pro' side doesnt get their way the first time.
Ellen
8:05 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Agreed. Let them get it out of their system. When it doesn't pass we will not have to hear them whining any longer.
Pat
3:17 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I say.......throw caution to the wind.........give women the vote!!!! Then make em get back into the kitchen where they belong.
Bill McDonnell
4:00 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Here we go again ..... time to clean off my illegal yard sign. But may I ask... why is not what is good for the goose (downtown and 1st st ect) NOT good for the gander (boardwalk)? Cause carring beer down the walk would hurt the select fews cause. But that would make the law fair for all, would it not?
OClocal
4:12 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
What a terrible idea. People choose to vacation and live here because OC is a "family" town. Dont change OC. PLEASE!
Beach View
11:26 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
OCLocal, what exactly is a "family town"? Is a family town one without alcohol? If that's the case, I submit that OC has never been a family town. There's alcohol everywhere. I'm sure there are many of you who would like to see that change, but, thankfully, the state will trump you on that one.
KF
4:24 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I don't see how allowing people to have a drink will suddenly change Ocean City into a cesspool of sin? Restaurants wouldn't even make money on BYOB. If you don't want to bring a bottle of beer to your meal then leave it at home. If I want to bring a bottle of beer I don't see how this will affect you? In the outside world BYOB is a minimum of culinary standards (unless Manco and Manco is your idea of a decent meal).
Beachy Keen
4:52 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Here we go again with BYOB. For me, other than the 2-3 eateries that I may go to, the restaruants in OC do nothing for me. Stop trying to make OC into something it is not. What it is is a tourist town with mediocre restaurants at best and and a struggling downtown. I don't have anything against having a glass of wine with dinner but I think more important issues need to be addressed first such as getting people to live her year round and getting businesses to stay here year round. I think I will have a glass of wine now b/c I can't bear to hear the arguments over BYOB one more time!
Ellen
8:11 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
OC something it is not..... mediocre restaurants at best..... struggling downtown......BYOB is going to heal it all! Yuuuuuuuuuup!
Beachy Keen
8:49 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Ellen I hope you are being sarcastic, sounds like you need a glass of wine!
Ellen
9:23 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Me sarcastic??? Heavens noooooooo:)
Pat
4:55 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Maybe we should vote in Prohibition again!!
Barbara Davis
5:08 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
If you want BYOB move to another town and leave ours the way it is and has been for years.
The reason we bought in OC is because it is a family town, and that's why Ocean City, New Jersey makes the news each year for being a wonderful place to vacation for familys.
Beach View
11:30 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
More "family town" stuff. I guess Stone Harbor and Avalon are not very good places for families to spend the summer, Barbara? I know quite a few people who would disagree with you. In fact, they would look at OC as the former Methodist summer camp a lot of provincial residents seem intent on making it.
Kevin D.
5:08 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
There are always two sides to a position and I respect the views of both. I am an OCNJ homeowner. It would seem reasonable that BYOB is not going to harm the reputation of OCNJ as a great family resort. I can't envision drunkards lining the streets following a meal. Over the course of the past 10 years, I certainly haven't seen that behavior at Mildred's, the Crab Trap, Deauville Inn, et.al. and those businesses are BYOB or On Premise liquor sales. However, what I have seen is a one hour wait to get a table because they are always packed with patrons - many from OCNJ. At the end of the day, BYOB will drive incremental business revenue, which equates to more taxes for OCNJ and increased commerce. If indeed BYOB causes issues, then repeal the law. That is the beauty of democracy!
Pat
5:07 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Hear Ye....Hear Ye!!!!!! Well said!!!
suzanne
1:09 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I agree Kevin. I have been to many a BYOB restaurant and have never seen anyone out of control. Having the option of BYOB would allow people to stay in OC for a nice dinner instead of sitting in traffic and then waiting an hour for dinner during the summer.
Kevin D.
5:18 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Barbara, again with respect to your opinion, it is important that all sides be represented and respected. Your reply is rather myopic and certainly not defensible. We bought in OCNJ for similar reasons. I doubt the BYOB will be the dearth of it remaining a wonderful destination. Do you think Boulevard Liquors is doing a booming business because OCNJ is dry? I doubt it! Permit democracy to take its due course and put it to a vote.
Beachy Keen
5:45 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Kevin, great points that you make except that somehow restaurants would have to open that would be of a higher caliber than what is currently offered in OC. Perhaps the idea is to allow BYOB and fabulous restaurants will follow..........I can't forsee OC becoming a year round destination spot but who knows. However, it the voters approve it then so be it. I have not observed drunken behaviors in any of the restuarnats we go to in Somers Point or Cape May or Sea Isle or Collingswood for that matter so that is a lame excuse for not wanting BYOB!
Beach View
11:32 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Agreed Beachy, we're talking "fine dining" here. There isn't any in OC, and hasn't been any for a very long time. Those of us who like this type of fare always head elsewhere.
Kevin D.
6:10 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Beachy Keen, you are spot-on about improving the caliber of restaurants. That may indeed be an unintended consequence and one I hadn't really considered. Yes, I agree that year round might be a bit of a stretch given the climate in December through March; nevertheless, it could contribute to more folks staying on the Island for lunch and dinner vs. crossing the bridge. All valid points you make.
Peg Miller
7:33 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Leave Ocean City the way it is, a family- friendly resort.
Beach View
11:34 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Again more "family" stuff. How is not having a bottle of wine at dinner a "family" thing? Unless you're a strict opponent of "demon rum". In that case, you have a right to your opinion; you don't have the right to inflict your views on others.
Neil Kaye
8:01 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
We would certainly dine out more in OC if we could bring a bottle of wine. Family resort and BYOB are not contradictory unless you really believe that no one with kids ever drinks alcohol. If you study towns that were "dry" and allowed BYOB, nothing bad happens. To the contrary, better restaurants do crop up. Don't kid yourself, there are actually residents of OCNJ who drink. It is also clear that in almost every issue of the OCNJ newspapers, the biggest ads are full page spreads from liquor stores "across the bridge" willing to deliver directly to your door in OCNJ. Let the issue go to voters. For those who think OC should never change, are you upset that there is a new bridge, that streets get re-paved, that the beach gets replenished, that the lagoons get dredged, etc. Change is part of life and should be embraced. This is a very narrow and carefully worded ordinance. No one wants drunken out of control behavior anywhere, but a bottle of wine between consenting adults when dining out at a restaurant off the boardwalk that must have table linens, between the hours of 2 PM and 11 PM isn't going to ruin the reputation of OCNJ.
Eric Sauder
8:14 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Alright I take issue with a number of statements that were made here. Excluding the boardwalk was a concession to those who feel BYOB will have a negative impact on the boardwalk's family reputation. Really its almost a nonissue since there are relatively few dining establishments on the boardwalk to begin with. I think it should be perceived for what it is ... sensitivity to the concerns of those who oppose BYOB.
In regard to the statements that BYOB will not benefit the restaurants because they won't profit from the sale of alchohol, or that the rate of turnover will decrease, the simple fact is that BYOB will at least help bring patrons to those restaurants that would otherwise go across the bay for dinner. If they don't profit from the sale of alchohol they will at least profit from an increase of volume in their core business.
It is shortsided to state that BYOB will change the character of this town where the vast majority of the people who live and vacation here consume alcohol. Walk up any alley in the summer time and look at the recycle containers. When an even larger percentage of the dinner crowd can have a drink with dinner (here) the demand will grow for something other than "family oriented" sub and pizza shops. New restaurants are likely to emerge that will cater more to a dinner crowd. The question is where those restaurants will emerge. Here in Ocean City or somewhere on the mainland?
Just some guy
12:11 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
How often do you walk up and down alleys looking at reycle containers? are you the guy who keeps crushing the cans up in front of my house every week?
Ellen
11:25 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Eric, one does not have to walk up the alley to determine alcohol consumption. All one has to do is listen to the recycles being dumped into the truck to hear all of the glass breaking!
Ellen
8:21 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Boulevard Liquors..... now there's a subject. I know this is off subject but do you ever see the parking lot packed? Nope - oh maybe the slots in front are filled with cars in and out but they own a lot more land for parking than that and you don't see cars filling those areas. Boulevard Liquors is $2 more expensive on EVERY bottle than Circle Liquors. Trust me, I did a study. I live on 22nd. It's just as easy for me to get to Circle as Boulevard and I'd rather save a few bucks and enjoy the historical crossing of the 9th St bridge (even if it is new and wonderful) and friendliness of Circle people.
Florence Moyer
9:19 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
You post twice against BYOB and then you give a detailed report about which offshore liquor store has better prices. Fascinating.
Ellen
11:19 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
What is so fascinating about it Florence? Do tell! I am against BYOB yet that does not mean that I don't enjoy a glass of Red. They are two different issues under the same subject heading. Florence, all ppl who are against BYOB are not anti-alcohol believe it or not. If ppl want to drink at home great - we enjoy having cocktails at home as do many ppl. However I, for one, would never schlep a wine bottle in a bag with me when I go out to dinner. That's not the way I roll when I dine out. Then again I would never 'dine out' in OC with the dining offerings we currently have. I am not convinced that upscale restaurants would find it economically feasible to anchor themselves in OC based on BYOB! What would be fascinating would be a study of fine dining establishments to find out how many brown bags they would need brought in per annum to justify the investment of a building, parking, a fine dining chef & his kitchen mates, fine china, linens, & everything else FINE that would be needed. BTW Florence, to feed your fascination, I always comparison shop. Aren’t you glad that you have that little snippet of information for your next run over the bridge?
Bob McArthur
12:36 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
My wife & I consume alcohol and we bought two properties (one rental & one summer home) in OC because it is a dry town. We feel that our property values remain high because of the Family Atmosphere a dry OC has. Make no mistake, once the camel's nose is under the tent, it will only be a matter of time that OC will become like Wildwood & Sea Isle.
Barbara Colombo
9:05 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Why don't you think of comparing it to Avalon and Stone Harbor? Both have wonderful family atmospheres and great restaurants with BYOB.
suzanne
1:16 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Bob your property values are high because you own in a beach community same as Avalon and Stone Harbor not because it is a dry town.
Wyatt
6:38 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
The uproar over the BYOB initiative would be more understandable if Ocean City were alcohol-free, but it certainly is not.
Those who are against BYOB because they believe it would compromise the City’s family friendly image should realistically consider how well-managed BYOB has impacted other nice towns. If this proposal is approved it will hardly be noticeable. Demon Rum and Satan will not enter town hand-in-hand over the new 9th Street bridge!
On the other hand proponents should not get too excited about BYOB creating a restaurant renaissance here.. The supporting publicity seems to be that BYOB will attract more customers during the off season. Maybe, but those who foresee BYOB resulting in an atmosphere in Ocean City where dining sophisticates will be able to leisurely discuss vintages, etc. over gourmet meals is unrealistic. There won’t be many dining changes.
In considering how to vote on this I suggest residents keep the old fable about the camel getting his nose into the tent in mind. Selling alcoholic beverages is the most profitable enterprise for restaurants which are able to do so. Once BYOB is in place and folks are used to it restaurateurs will likely propose they be permitted to sell them. Such a proposal won’t then seem like a big step beyond BYOB. Voters should not reject BYOB because of this, just that they should keep in mind this natural progression over time and be prepared to deal with it when it comes up.
Eric Sauder
11:31 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Your point is well taken and your approach balanced Wyatt and I appreciate the thought given to it. I would only say that most of those who support BYOB (like me) will not support the sale of alchohol in Ocean City. I don't see the one following the other. There's a huge difference between allowing for consumption of alchohol in OC (under the terms of the BYOB petition) and allowing for the SALE of alchohol in Ocean City. I personally am not aware of too many people who would support the later.
In regard to your other comment I can only say (all other things being the same) that I would be more inclined to go out for dinner in Ocean City instead of going across the bay if I had that option. I don't think I'm alone in that. It doesn't mean that that will lead to more upscale dinning establishments in Ocean City, but I do think there is reason to believe it will.
Duffer
7:01 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I want to know the name of every restaurant in town that is in favor of this. Stand up and be counted so I know who not to patronize again in the future.
Beach View
11:36 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Maybe you could burn an effigy of a wine bottle in front of their door ;-)
Beachy Keen
7:50 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
There is no guarantee that outstanding restaurants will open if BYOB is allowed. Will these eateries sit there empty in the off months. OC is not Cape May, it is not Collingswood and it is not Somers Point and never will be. First order of business should be to revitalize the downtown and then to incentivize people to live here year round. Why should the boardwalk be excluded--look at Clancy's as it already has a "bar" in the front. I have nothing against BYOB but just put it on the ballot and let the voters decide once and for all!
Don't Be Naive
7:59 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Has anyone considered the number of speak easies in OC? Private clubs that only members and their guests can drink in? Don't be foolish, Ocean City is NOT a dry town. For Pete's sake people, the VFW sells alcohol!!!
Rick
8:06 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Here it goes again. I supported a vote back in the fall but really I am just sick of hearing about this topic anymore. At this point I don't care what the eating establishments do. By the way John, The state already legalized pot. and perhaps some of you need a perscription for it. Way to many people ARE WRAPPED TO TIGHTLY here
Beachy Keen
8:10 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
My one other thought on this is this: with the budget in a shambles, homevalues still plummeting, public contracts out of control, less and less year round residents, less tax revenues, unemployment high, more undesirables moving to town, lawsuits all over the place, unethical and immoral behaviors rewarded and promoted among the publics, developers raping every inch of buildable space in town, taxes going up every year and people are worried that somebody might be having a glass of wine while out to dinner with their family. Its laughable!
Beachy Keen
8:13 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Rick, well said and I couldn't agree more. I'm sick of hearing about it too and I could care less what the restaurants do as I sitll will go off the island for dinner. Other than 2-3 eateries in town, the food is not that good anyway.
John Fischer
8:54 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
We have very poor grocery stores in Ocean City. I go off the island for most of my grocery shopping. Perhaps if we allow grocery stores in Ocean City to sell beer and wine, the grocery stores will get better. It might bring them more business in the off season and we might even be able to save $2 a bottle we pay off the island. Perhaps we should also let gas stations sell beer, then our gas stations will get better.
Beachy Keen
9:05 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@John,, dear God, do you want the townsfolk to tar and feather you! Hush man, speak of this only in the privacy of your own home
Pat
8:54 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
What is this about speak easys someone wrote of??? How is it that the VFW can sell alcohol?? News to me.
Beachy Keen
9:12 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I didn't know the VFW sold alcohol either but good for them if they do!
To me a modern day speak easy in OC consists of me buying lots of alcohol and inviting my friends and family over to my home in OC to drink it. No cover charge needed, just a donation of wine, beer or snacks to share. We might even order take out from one or two of the town eateries. Then I brazenly put all of the empty alcohol bottles in the trash in the alley to convince the doubters roaming the alleys that people really do drink alcohol in OC! Who knew???
happycamper
8:57 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
yes, Pat, they have been around for years--in America's greatest, dry, friendly, family totally hypocritical town.
Kevin D.
8:55 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Many valid perspectives shared by both sides of the equation. Understandably I can appreciate folks being sick of hearing about the BYOB initiative. However, it would be unwise to take an apathetic viewpoint on this topic. I actually do care about the direction of the this initiative and the effect it will have on our city. I am supportive of BYOB and in general supportive of change.
Beachy Keen
9:05 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
To all for and against BYOB,, if OC was going to change direction and move into a renaissance of shops and restaurants, it would have happened by now. Instead, in my short time here what I have observed is that a few old timers have a strangle hold on the city combined with bunch of nit wits that run the place who have limited forward thinking at all and limited if any accountability to taxpayers. The only forward thinking seems to be how can we get more from the taxpayers. Better to run the place into the ground and blame somebody else. I wonder what all of the 2nd homeowners who have to say about this issue since they are the ones paying for services that they do not receive for 9 months out of the year. Let's get the 2nd homeowners involved and let them have a say. Maybe they would come to their homes during the off months if OC had more to offer. Of course, nobody wants input from anybody except the year round old timers and nay sayers. More of the same never ends well.
vic
9:15 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
moorestown, nj, recently allowed byob. now they progressed to allowing hard liquor to be served in restaurants. the moorestown mall is closing its movie theaters in order to bring in alcohol serving restautants. allowing byob in ocean city will only be the first step to eventually allowing any type of alcohol to be served in restaurants and eventually sold. i will not patronize any establishment in ocean city that supports byob. don't mess with success!
Beach View
1:37 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Vic, you are completely wrong. You are not even close to the truth:
http://moorestown.patch.com/articles/yes-wins
I lived in Mt Laurel during the 80's and 90's. We routinely brought wine to dinner with us when eating in town. They've had BYOB for a very long time. As far as the movie theater goes:
http://moorestown.patch.com/articles/new-moorestown-mall-theater-will-be-state-of-the-art.
It's unfortunate that someone so poorly informed should be entitled to their opinion. I'd call you a fool, but that wouldn't be nice.
Beachy Keen
9:25 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Patrick, I do live here but it occured to me that the 2nd homeowners most definitely are the majority. You don't have to have a fit over it, I was writing and thinking out loud. In my mind, it is people like you who make assumptions and since you stated you have lived her for 53 years, you most likely are one of the old timers who thinks you are entitled to force your wishes on others. Your obvious disdain and disrespect for the 2nd homeowners is also evident in your rant further demonstrating your intolerant and hostile attitude towards them. I guess you hate the tourists too. I wouldn't bite the hand that feeds you as these 2nd homeowners pay the bulk of the taxes here in relation to density of homes. Most that I know are well off enough they could give their homes away and not miss a beat furthering the decline.
Beachy Keen
9:53 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Patrick, I apologize if I took your post the wrong way. I try to see all points of view regarding BYOB and other issues. I just think that sometimes the "long term, full time residents" feel that they should have the final say even though ALL are paying taxes. I agree it is not fair in many ways and I also think that perhaps second homeowners should have some say in what goes on here. As far as those not patronizing restaurants that want BYOB, keep in mind that these owners are our neighbors and this is their livlihood in a tough economy. If you disagree with BYOB, vote againsit it in private. As far as BYOB, put it on the ballot, let people vote and get it over with once and for all.
John K
9:26 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
BYOB is not going to help Ocean City's problems. My wife and I are the 3rd generation having property in OC. We have owned for over 30 yrs and lived here full time for 8 yrs. Our town is in terrible condition - boardwalk decking disgraceful, street paving is patch over patch - downtown and 9th St entrance looks dirty, businesses close for the winter. Taxes are high, government corruption with public worker unions is rampant. Expensive - under performing public schools with declining enrollment - dependent on off-island pupils. Year round population is declining for all of the above reasons. BYOB will not cure any of these problems - it starts another probable problem - next step liquor licenses. There are very few restaurants worth eating in here. Fix the real problems - why make new problems.
Beach View
1:14 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Let me ask a question, John. We live in a town that takes in almost 3 times the revenue it should for the number of local residents who live here year round and who according to Patrick are the only ones anyone cares about. The entire south end of the end is empty the vast majority of the year. Let me ask you, where does the money go? In your opinion, we should fix all the problems the city has before even beginning to have a discussion about BYOB. This town is living off the backs of second home owners and has for decades. It has spawned a really pathetic entitlement attitude on the part of some locals. They built that palace of a high school on the beach instead of opting for a more cost effective location offshore. Did anyone ever think about or ask what that parcel of land was worth during the height of the real estate boom, about the time the school was built? I doubt anyone even thought of it. No, as long as the actual year round residents of this town do not feel the full burden of what their goodies cost, nothing will change.
Beachy Keen
2:19 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Beach View---well said. Although I do think the town needs to be updated and the downtown re-vamped. I don't think BYOB would do much to help with that but it could be the start of something new.
Could not agree more that this town is living off the backs of the 2nd homeowners and most of these locals do have an entitlement attitude. Where does the money go? That should generate other discussions.
AJ
3:45 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
John K: sounds like a terrrible place to live! I live in an Ocean City that's a great community, with good schools, reasonable taxes, a beautiful new community center, great beaches, a new state-of-the-art entrance into town. A town that's clean and safe with wonderful people and neighbors! You should come visit some time!
John Fischer
9:34 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I remember the great restaurants in Ocean City's past, Chris's, Hogates, Watsons, Maiers,etc. They did not close because of no BYOB. They closed because the land they sat on was more valuable for another use. Restaurants need space. Space is expensive in Ocean City. A successful restaurant needs lots of parking...more space. BYOB is not going to reverse that fact. How about lots of free parking around all restaurants?
Eleanor
10:38 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
John F and John K make some good points. A high end restaurant is an expensive deal - not only to run in terms of food, but in terms of the environment you have to provide, plus the parking issue. OC restaurants are what they are because of the land values, tax structures and because it is what their clientele - tourist families with school age kids - want. Yes some people will go over the bridge to drink with dinner but there is also that influx of people coming into OC to get to the boardwalk for some pizza, some rides and some good clean fun.
The fact is OC has a brand and the alcohol policy is part of that brand. It was not part of the brand of Avalon or Stone Harbor or Haddonfield or Collingswood or any other small town. Right now that brand is not only what brings in tourists but it is also what keeps people living here in spite of high taxes. I think we need to get past this one issue that will not change OC in any way that is long-term beneficial and think in terms of why we are not attracting young families, why our school population is declining even after building that giant HS that was supposed to attract them and why 'For Sale' and empty storefronts are more prominent.
Kevin D.
9:36 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Patrick. Your platitude of "let them eat cake" for 2nd homeowners is unfathomable. Who do you think supports the majority of the infrastructure within OCNJ? It sure isn't the 12,000+ year round residents. if the 2nd homeowners and vacationers didn't underwrite the city via commerce, investment and taxes, it would be a depressed and impoverished ghost town. Perhaps you don't quite understand the economics of running a city. As for taxation without representation, that too will change - it is just a matter of time. There happens to be strength in numbers and extolling an attitude such as yours will be the fodder to effect the change.
Rick
6:25 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Kevin, Most people (Locals) seem to lose their touch on reality after about 5-10 years, SInce I have only lived here for 4 years I have a couple more to go before I go nuts. As for 12,000 year round residents, I truely believe that is total BS. I know far to many primary residents that leave and go south in the winter but still keep this town as primary and vote and pay income taxes here. I counldn't find 12,000 people here in the winter if I wanted to. 12,000 year round residents and only 3500 voters? Come on. We have 3500 people ruling hundreds of thousands. I am a local voter and it makes me sick.
Beachy Keen
9:42 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@John K. Well said. This is what I have been saying but the mentality here is to focus on BYOB. Perhaps this is the distraction that will take away from the real issues facing this town!
CTA
10:06 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
What goes around, comes around<----famous old saying......this all comes down to those 12,000 folks who actually live in OC.(i don't, i Did for 55 years).....will BYOB help OC? probabily not, but lets have the vote and shut the johnny come latelys up once and for all.
Beachy Keen
10:20 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Patrick, I would think that you would be more concerned with the other serious issues facing this town. Once the 2nd homeowners sell out, and many can afford to do just that, the town becomes even more of a ghost town. As the town declines, tourists find other appealing beach towns to go to that are family friendly and most serve alcohol. Second homeowners, can still donate to campaigns, influence candidates, have connections, and all sorts of other things so don't be so sure that 2nd owners do not have a say in ways other than voting.
Parker Miller
10:23 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I'd like to know the rest of the restaurants that are backing BOYB so that I can boycott them along with the Chatterbox, Cousins, Who's On First, and Captain Bob's. None of these 4 is very good in my opinion anyway.
I notice Piccini which is busy year round and has an hour wait every night in season isn't listed among the BOYB'ers. Might the secret of running a success restaurant that alludes the BYOB'ers is to serve better food?
Beachy Keen
10:59 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Parker, you are another one of those vindictive and spiteful people who will wreak havoc on your neighbors if they do not agree with youor if they see things differently. The owners of the restaurants you mention depend on patrons for their living. They are our neighbors and contibuting members of our community. So much for the family values, Christian townfolk.........very mean spirited. If you don't agree with BYOB then vote NO if it comes around on the ballot. Don't spew your mean and spiteful behaviors onto others who have differing opinions.
Eleanor
12:55 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I will not stop going to Whos On First because they are great - admittedly i go as a morning patron but their coffee, scones and baked goods are outstanding.
But the fact is other than one or two names, i dont know which restaurants are behind this and if they feel so strongly i think they should say so. I would like to see what restaurant owners would plan to institute a BYOB policy if it passes.
Beachy Keen
1:14 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Eleanor, what does it matter which restaurants are supporting BYOB and which are not? Why do the restaurants have to say anything? If it should pass, the individual owners can decide what to do. If you care to eat at an establishment that allows BYOB no one is forcing you to bring a bottle of wine. Why would you like to know which restaurants plan on BYOB if it passes. How will it hurt you or help you? At least Parker as vindictive as it sounds, makes his intent for knowing clear. So why do you need to know?
Kevin D.
1:23 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I see absolutely no value whatsoever in knowing which restaurants are or are not supportive of BYOB. What difference does it make in determining the outcome of a vote, should the petition garner sufficient support to be on the ballot? Secondly, it is the right of a capitalistic society for a business to make their own decision on what they want to provide as long as within the confines of the law. To that end, let's please move on to another argument or perspective that merits commentary.
suzanne
1:31 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Piccin is not my idea of good food I really don't know why people stand in line. I think its all about location and word of mouth. Casa de Dolce on Asbury has better food and no lines.
Beach View
1:42 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I'm with Beachy, Parker, you're a troll.
Pat
2:12 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
So you want to "out" all those establishments in favor of BYOB?? Sounds like the Salem Witch Hunt!!! Like anything else......this BYOB issue will stink for awhile and then it will go away.
Eleanor
6:35 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Beachy (below) Why would a business that supports BYOB want to hide it, if it is such a wonderful idea for the town and the towns economy? If there is nothing wrong with it and it would bring business to the downtown and give us some upscale restaurants shouldnt these businesses come forward with their support of BYOB? Why hide?
One reason i think people have a right to know is that it would be interesting to see how much of this petition drive is driven by outside interests - restaurant owners who own homes and pay home property taxes and choose to live elsewhere but picked OC to open a restaurant. Now there is nothing wrong with that - many people work one place and have their business somewhere else. But when you try to change the character and tradition of your workplace town and if it is a change for the worse, dont have to live with it and can just pull up stakes and open your business elsewhere - i think the residents of OC should have that information.
John K
10:24 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Our downtown merchants have a huge problem. How can they compete with internet , no hassle, no parking problems, no parking meter maids, UPS to your door delivery of anything at a competitive price. The avenue is a nice place for a walk - not for serious shopping. Where in OC could you purchase sheets or bedding ? No Stantons anymore.Our town is changing - not for the better. "New Master Plan" thinking of High Rises. BYOB then Liquor = Ocean City MD. We are in deep trouble.
Ellen
11:34 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
You left out 'no sales tax'. In most cases there is no sales tax if one is frequenting small businesses on the internet.
Phil Rogers
10:31 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
To characterize the lack of voice in local issues for 2nd home owners as "unfair" is irrelevant ! All 2nd home owners have to do is register to vote in OC. That would be a nightmare for the "old guard(s)' . When that happened in Cape May the local's influence nadired ! Then we got a bunch of know- it- alls who can't agree on anything and make themselves crazy about issues like the facade of the new convention center.
Ellen
11:36 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Phil, I believe second homeowners cannot vote in NJ unless they claim the home as their primary residence. Someone correct me?
Rick
8:47 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Ellen, your correct. They must declare it their primary home and pay income taxes here. THe voters registration dept realy likes to see a NJ drivers lic., also. The lic is NOT required but you can expect some problems without it.
Beachy Keen
11:05 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Patrick, as a resident for 53 years I can understand why you love OC and would choose to stay. However, I would guess that most 2nd homeowners do not feel that way or they would be there year round. We as taxpayers have way more power than the nit wits who run this town would have us believe but that is a discussion for another time. In the meantime, I will wait and see if BYOB makes it onto the ballot and if so, hopefully it can be resolved one way or another.
steve
12:56 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I wonder what people will say when I open my medical marijuana clinic? I hope I don't meet this much resistance;-)
Eric Sauder
1:01 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
At least your clientele will be a a little more laid back :)
Pat
1:01 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
How about a pool hall??
Beachy Keen
1:18 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
How about Steve and Pat open the pool hall together with the medical marijuana clinic next door? The pool hall can have a few tables with tablecloths and serve some snacky dinner fare so we can wash down our munchies with a few beers! Wouldn't that be a hot one for those uptight holy than thou residents! Geez!
Kevin D.
1:28 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Now Steve, that is interesting. I would venture to guess that there isn't an ordinance against that since it would be medicinal in nature vs. recreational. Looking for a business partner?
Pat
1:29 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Beachy Keen........Great business idea.....you are a Renissance man (or woman). Now aboutr giving women the right to vote??? When are we gonna debate that on this site??
Beach View
1:41 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I'm in for the house of ill repute.
Let's see that's a medical marijuana clinic, next to the pool hall, adjacent to the cathouse, all without alcohol....
Pat
1:45 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
In defference to our founding fathers and defenders of the faith.......Said cat house, pool hall, munchie parlor and medical marijuana clinic would have to be BYOB in accordance with local law and custom. Absolutely NO alcohol will be sold on the premisis!!!!!!! And that means YOU and You know who you are!!!!
Pat
2:17 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Tattoo and Piercing Parlor!!!!!!!
Eric Sauder
2:27 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
You can bet there WILL be an ordinance against that. All this talk of decadent stuff is making me feel parched. Later people.
heh heh
Eric Sauder
2:34 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
By the way officer my real name is Pete and I live on the 50 something block.
(sorry Pete :)
Rick
6:35 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
A lot of potential customers for stress related illness here
Rick
6:36 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
BYOHB Bring your own hash bar
Beachy Keen
2:30 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Pat, I like the way you think! The possibilities are endless! We can then open an adult store that sells fantasy gifts and products. Of course no alcohol will be served here. Since women already have the right to vote, how about a woman owns the tatoo parlor and we can throw in a few ethnic and minority eateries so as not to offend anyone. Oh yeah and we could have the methadone clinic a few doors down from the marijuana place. We could get tax dollars to do that one! Asbury Avenue will be hopping well past 6pm!
Pat
3:51 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Beachy........You are full of good ideas......why, you should run for office......MAYOR!!
All this decadence makes the BYOB issue look like childs play!!
John K
5:26 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Beach View - Sorry for the slow responce. Even 3 times the revenue they receive from taxpayers is not enough for the local political and public employee unions. Yes the South end is deserted for most of the year. The "pathetic entitlement attitude" is disgusting. Approx 2 million for a 40 space parking lot at the boardwalk ( 1 Million over appraisal) . Save their "Lifeguard Station" to cost about 4 million ( and loss of ratables) to re-convert a 100 year old house. $1,300,000. to replace the grass playing field at the palatial High School ( that took 3 referendums to get passed) with artificial turf. I can't believe the lifeguards get a pension ! Firemen falsify records (fraud) and are still employed. I think almost all property from 5th to 6th St & the boardwalk to the bay is city owned (not on tax rolls) with the exception of the Tabernacle. Now the city is purchasing the Schriver lots at 21st & boardwalk for $1.2 Million. Fortunately the Mayor changed his mind and is allowing the Ethics Committee to remain. Thank goodness for small concessions. I think they took lessons from obama !
Beach View
5:36 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
You're right John, three referendums to get the artificial turf passed? These people really don't give up do they? They don't accept the fact that this is a stupid, wasteful use of taxpayer revenue. But, hey, the 2nd homeowners will pay, won't they? Lifeguards used to be a sexy summer job. What's this crap about pensions? I'm assuming that it's for the supervisors. What do they do after September? I've been here long enough to know that anything that results in soaking the summer visitors (parking lots) will be leaped upon as a revenue generator. It's a shame they don't have to think like a normal town, where each resident owns a home and pays their taxes. Here, 3/4 of the homes on the island pay taxes without any say whatsoever. I have to flag down a trash truck or a snow plow in winter. It's the gravy train, my friend, plain and simple.
Rick
6:53 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I thought I had seen crooked local gov'ts before. Hell, just about all are, But this town is the worst I have ever seen. Crooked from start to finish
Beachy Keen
6:14 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I wonder what everyone thinks about the new school budget vote or I should say lack there of. By moving it to Nov. we no longer have a say in the budget as long as it stays within the 2% cap. Seems like we have less and less say in how they spend our money. Does anybody know anything about this?
Rick
6:39 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Beachy, your killing me He he
AJ
3:39 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Beachy: I think OC had a 25% voter turnout for school board/budget. Only 1 in 4 voters show up to vote, and you're upset that voters don't have a say???
Beachy Keen
7:11 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Eleanor, as I think I have stated througout this post, I don't think it relevant that we need to know which restaruants are for or against. You have people like Duffer and Parker who will then vindicitvely boycott those businesses if they have a different view or opinion on trying something new. As I recall from the last round of BYOB many other people did the same and it became very nasty. Sounds like you might do the same. No reason to know other than some of these vindictive and small minded OC locals want to force their wishes onto businesses by boycotting them. Who is anybody to tell someone else how to run their eatery? Put it to a vote and settle it once and for all. If only all of this spiteful and vindictive energy was directed towards the outrageous public contracts and inept politicians running the place, perhaps there would not be budgetary desperation to try anything to bring in revenue.
vic
8:13 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
beach view, you are so ignorant and behind the times that it is impossible to have a conversation with you. i'm glad you live in mt. laurel (and not ocean city) because you know nothing about what is happening in moorestown concerning byob. byob has only been allowed in moorestown for a few years. get your facts straight! alcohol is now allowed in restaurants. get your facts straight! i check my facts before i make a public statement. obviously, you don't. byob is always the 1st step in allowing public alcohol consumption in a municipality. it's always one step at a time.
Beach View
8:53 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Despite my sending you the two links in question, you still insist on being "ignorant". I no longer live in Mt. Laurel, Vic, I live here in OC, and I do fully understand the situation both here and in Moorestown. I am telling you, 20 years ago I was bringing wine to dinner at a restaurant in Moorestown. The place was called Cafe la Bella, and my wife and two kids had dinner there on Saturday nights after Mass at Our Lady of Good Counsel Church. Do some research Vic, you might learn something.
Rick
8:20 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Who cares if every local boycots every business in town. We don't have enough locals to keep a WAWA in the heart of town open. The businesses here really are not targeting locals, the life blood of their business is summer crowds. So locals, (myself included) go ahead and boycot and see how little you really mean to the economy here.
Pat
9:59 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
This is the first sensible comment I have heard on the topic. It's not about the locals......that is not where the money is.......it's about supporting the tourist trade in a tourist town.
John K
3:11 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
John Fischer posted earlier that Ocean City used to have a lot of good, large restaurants. Watson's Restaurant @9th & Ocean 1934 to ? 1980 with 500 seats. Beck's which became Holgates @ 9th & Bay 1936 to 1972 seating ? approx. 300. Chris' Restaurant near 9th & Bay from around 1932 to 1972 seating 250, also had 6 boats 70 ft to 50 ft for rides & or fishing. These restaurants prospered without BYO and were all open in OC during the same time. Why can't current restaurants do the same ? The property value on the island is probably to a large extent the reason. Similar reason that Marinas & boatyards have disappeared from the bayfront. BYO won't change the situation. Oh - and I am an 'old gizzer' and had also been a 2nd homeowner for those that complain about older folk.
Eric Sauder
4:46 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
John you make a good point. I remember those places ... they gave Ocean CIty an identity that has been lost. And you hit the nail on the head. All of those restaurants were torn down for multi-family residences or condos. That's why it's so important to have good zoning in place and have it enforced.
Those restaurants prospered without BYOB, tis true. But times have changed. People that vacation or toursit here now go off the island to eat. Some of that has to do with wanting to have alcohol with dinner. Some of it has to do with unchecked development pressure that led to the demise of our restaurants. We don't have many of them left. Most of what we do have caters to the lunch crowd, which is why (I think) our downtown is all but desterted in the evening.
Eric Sauder
4:47 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
When I think of BYOB I think oif the downtown area ... how it could carve out a niche as a fine dining and entertainment area, much as the downtown area of Cape May has become. But to be successful today I don't kow that you can afford to eliminate a large section of the dining crowd. And I don't think having BYOB in downtown restaurants will adversely effect Ocean City as a family resort. I see potentlal for good coming from it, and little harm. And I don't subscribe to the slippery slope theory. I don't think there's much support for the sale of alcohol in Ocean City, even among those who do support BYOB. We like Ocean CIty as it is. We just want to see more year around residents and our downtown area succeed..
Rick
5:01 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Eric, Well said. There is NO support for the sale of alcohol. Maybe someday that will change too, but i doubt in my lifetime.
Rick
5:04 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
If BYOB was passed, I would likely frequent a few eateries in town (In the off season mind you). I always go off island now. I still would most of the time, but it would keep me on island some of the time during the winter
Beachy Keen
6:44 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Well said Eric! I think you summarized the whole thing nicely. We go off island to eat also but we would definitely try new and/or existing restaurants if they were BYOB for dinner. It will be a long road but maybe some day the downtown will be re-vitalized. I think in this current economic environment, there may not be many business people who would want to take the risk of opening an upper scale restuarnant but heck we have to start someplace if we want people to stay year round.
Eric Sauder
10:56 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Thanks Beachy. Did you figure out why the mayor changed his position? One resident stated at the counciil meeting that there was a clear public mandate our elected officials could not ignore. I think that carried weight. I take the mayor at his word but I think there was more to it than that.
Anna
7:06 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
BYOB can never lead to the sale of alcohol from multiple establishments whether they be restaurants, bars, hotels or retail liquor outlets. The sale of alcohol is controlled by State license when permitted by an individual municipality. The laws of the State of New Jersey restrict the number of sales licenses to the census population. Therefore, on the remote chance that some day the City of Ocean City would allow the sale of alcohol, the number of licenses permitted by State law would be no more than 2 for the entire city based on a census population of 12,000.
Eric Sauder
10:45 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I didn't know the number of liquor liscenses was limited by the number of residents. In any event I don't see the municipality making application. I don't want bars in Ocean City. I don't think the residents of this town want them either. I hope that statement will ease the fears of those that maintain that BYOB will turn Ocean City into a party town ... another Wildwood. But then some people need their fears.
Thanks for the informative comment :)
John K
10:52 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
So many (including me) have commented about the Ocean City population shrinking. I recall that in the winter traffic lights were off (and covered) and temporary stop signs were placed at intersections. Hardly any cars were parked on streets - it was a ghost town. Checked census data OC population: 1940= 4672; 1950= 6040; 1960= 7618; 1970=10,575; 1980=13,979; 1990= 15,512; 2000= 15,378; 2010= 11,701 . This indicates OC's population increasing - except in the last 10 years when we lost 3,677 residents. The recent loss is probably due to the economy, real estate "values", and high taxes. Not lack of BYOB ( Ha, Ha )
Beach View
11:30 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Those facts are stubborn things (that is unless you're Vic). You are absolutely right, the decline in population has nothing to do with BYOB it has to do with the cost of living here. NJ boasts the highest taxes in the nation. We pay so much and get so little in return. If you were a homeowner in 1974, when a single family home on Asbury sold for $42,500, you'd have been a fool not to get out when the value of that property rose tenfold. Many did. Our memories of the ghost town that Ocean City used to be was before gambling in AC. Gambling changed everything at the shore, some would say for the better, some for the worse. The communities of EHT, Marmore, Seaville, were mile markers along some highway or other until the advent of gaming in AC. Now they are in one degree or another, thriving communities. For the most part, the property values and the tax rates in OC preclude folks with average incomes from living here. Indeed, my wife and I were talking the other day about retirement and making our money last as long as we do. There are few places left where this can happen and none of them are in NJ.
As far as BYOB is concerned, me, and thousands of others, will keep taking our business elsewhere, until the opponents of this issue inevitably fade away, which they will.
We used to have blue laws here, remember?
Tired of Hypocrisy
3:16 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Stantons, Sims, Watson's, Connoisseur Shop, Flanders shops, etc. All nice, a bit prices but those who lived or summered in OC could well afford it. Never meant to be a Wildwood or Atlantic City. No need for trash cans on the beach, no one ate or drank beer/wine/soda on the beach back then. Blue laws kept most of the people that wanted to 'party' off the island. They vacationed in other towns. Greed enters the picture. Single family homes torn down & replaced w/multi-family homes. Homes built in the southend on marshes, water/sewer problems. Larger police force needed. Larger city government needed. Thank goodness for this new rash of taxpayers or what would OC have done? Perhaps stayed the nice, quiet family town it once was. Most rented homes back then for 1/2 or full season, can't remember 1 week rentals back then. Why would anyone staying in OC for a week give a dang about it? They don't. All the nicer stores closed, dollar store pops up, boardwalk stores become mirrors of ones in Wildwood. People walking around in flip flops & bathing suits on the boardwalk <gasp>. New restaurants come into town. Oops, didn't realize couldn't have alcohol in the restaurant, better change that law too, after all, the Blue Laws were knocked down and look how much better OC is for it. Progress to some is regression to others. If you think OC is going to be better with BYOB, vote for it. Time will tell. What type of people does OC wish to attract & what type of people do you want renting?
Pat
3:45 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Snob. Americas Greatest Family Resort does not translate......we only cater to the wealthy, we will judge you and turn our nose up at you if we deem you un-worthy. And......having money does not insure a person has class.......far from it.
Robert Brant
10:07 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
If Ocean City is truly the great city that it is, a glass of wine with dinner at a nice restaurant will not plunge it into Sodom and Gomorrah as some would have you believe- place the BYOB on the ballot and let the democratic process work; don't allow the parochial special interests to intimidate those that would prefer the BYOB opportunity
OC Penn
1:28 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Please...not again! Just let this come before the voters..up or down will be better than this constant discussion! The businesses that are driving this are convinced that their mediocre business will become great when I can bring a 6 pack with me. Those that want OC to stay the way it is will never be convinced that it will stay the same once there are BYOB establishments. Can't we just agree to disagree and let the voters decide??? But please, whatever happens after a vote, lets not continue this discussion for the rest of our lives!! If it passes, so be it...learn to live with it. If it is voted down, then take your business off island or learn to live with what the voters want. Once more and done! Please, take whatever we get!!
AJ
3:35 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Very well said OC Penn!!!
Phil Rogers
5:14 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Actually I think this discussion is most helpful and the thread should continue. It clearly takes away consideration of minor elements like the Ethics Board's continued existance, type of wood to used on the boardwalk, whether any seasonal employees are getting unemployment and future contracts/pensions for uniformed employees and if people who have never spent five minutes lifeguarding are qualified to decide whether having surfboats is a good idea.
Jim
9:03 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
"Fine dining." What exactly does that mean? Apparently, one can only experience it if you're drinking some kind of alcohol. Is that true? If so, and If you can't drink due to some health or addictive problem I guess you will never experience fine dining. Oh well. Them's the breaks.
Jim Arthur